This is intriguing and I would appreciate if possible to get any sources to read up on this?
123 karma · joined February 26, 2020
This is intriguing and I would appreciate if possible to get any sources to read up on this?
Is it really moving the goalposts to say that comparing the economic impact spread over decades isn't the same as one experienced relatively instantaneously?
Or the risk of retaliation from a nuclear power isn't comparable to guerilla warfare?
Moving goalposts or not, it just doesn't seem to be an apt comparison to gauge military rationality.
Hi there! Just a friendly note since it appears that there might be a slight misunderstanding (perhaps ESL?)
The "deadman's switch" [1] is not in reference to you (the creator) being a literal dead person, but rather to the definition of your service being built to operate in the event something (like being kidnapped/killed/incapacitated) happens to the user.
Hope that helps clear up the confusion.
---
I really appreciate your analysis. Perhaps my comment was unclear, but it was in reference to the GP asking
> Why do you think this is plain wrong?
Since from my understanding the injunction should still be in effect (as mentioned by another commenter). Of course with the added disclaimer that I am not a corporate lawyer.
> I seriously recommend not relying on blog analysis of a court case and instead reading the court documents, and if you are unable to do so (understandable!) to avoid participating in the conversation in the manner of correcting someone.
I appreciate your candor - while I may exhibit elements of imposter syndrome, I believe I didn't add noise to the SNR of this post since it was my intention to expand on the aformentioned GP's question.
In an effort to stifle off regulation, the self-interest of giant corporations are aligned with their otherwise powerless developers - even if coincidentally.
If the duopoly wasn't under scrutiny, this "luck" would have run out as there would be no real viable competition.
1: https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/9/21492334/epic-fortnite-ap...
You will need a 42.9% markup to counteract the 30% cut.
0: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-autom...
It would not only be classified as a bad bot (if unsolicited), but it would violate Twitter's automation rules [0]
0: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-autom...
It's a building block that might pave the way for something else.
keyword there being "new"
It was under a different agreement from the regular "Epic Games" that Apple decided to both terminate
NB: I have lived in these countries, and I am also part of what you may call a "protected group" in western areas. I have come to terms with it.
Counter examples:
1 - PRC's treatment of Uighar muslims, LGBTQ+, Tibetans
2 - Light-hearted potrayals of lolicon, sexual harassment in the entertainment (specifically anime) industry
3 - "No foreigners / (insert specific race group here)" signs in some Japanese establishment that normalize xenophobia.