276 karma · joined January 25, 2021
You can find me at: https://huwfulcher.com
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/huwfulcher; my proof: https://keybase.io/huwfulcher/sigs/oxU3GC_S7uKggXi5WhVmGcTi9JpDaUoJmw8zC-APRkM ]
There’s also work on a Web of Trust in some clients that filters notes from people that don’t meet the WOT score. It’s essentially a weighted score based on who you follow and who they follow
Even if I use Cursor (or some other equivalent) and review the code I find my mental model of the system is much more lacking. It actually had a net negative on my productivity as it gave me anxiety at going back to the codebase.
If an AI tool could help a user interactively learn the mental model I think that would be a great step in the right direction.
Protocols like Nostr offer a good alternative to this. At the moment relays are just used as nodes in the decentralised network but there is work on how to view feeds from specific relays which could make the idea of content specific relays more likely
Hmmmmmm no
I interact regularly with AWS to support our needs in MLOps and to some extent GenAI. 3 of the experts we talked to have all left for competitors in the last year.
re:Invent London this year presented nothing new of note on the GenAI front. The year before was full of promise on Bedrock.
Outside of AWS, I still can’t fathom how they haven’t integrated an AI assistant into Alexa yet either
Ultimately it's down to the patient to put in the work but if the NHS focused more on creating community practices where these things could be more widely available then maybe we should see more meaningful change.
The NHS doesn't seem (as an outsider looking in) to do well with preventative care. I firmly believe (without necessarily a lot of evidence) that if we focused more on healthy lifestyles and made them more cost effective for people the amount of money we plough into the NHS every year could be reduced drastically.
I still think the way they've done this stinks though.
I sympathise with the problem of re-sellers abusing their hard work but they are also creating two different classes of product with this change.
On X I mainly occupy the indie hacker space which is focused on that topic. There are definitely more political conversations that come up but it’s much easier to filter those out.
On the flip side I find the discourse on X a lot more varied. There are definitely big problems with the types of conversations that happen on X but I have to go out of my way to find them. On Mastodon it's not that hard, mainly down to it being a smaller pool of content.
ActivityPub/Mastodon is flawed at its core with its concept of federation. They paint a pretty utopian picture of decentralised communities but there really isn't much difference between them. They are mostly part of the same political zeitgeist and if you don't toe the line you get banned. Once you're banned that's it, you've lost your profile, sure you can recreate elsewhere but have to start from scratch.
For the problems alternatives have like Nostr at least they are truly censorship resistant.
Gov departments are notorious for not giving correct requirements, changing requirements or swamping the project in bureaucracy.
If we said firms couldn’t rebid after a failed project (without the cool off) I suspect there wouldn’t be many firms left.
It shouldn’t be this way but unfortunately it is.