603 karma · joined September 13, 2017
It's not cynical to realise will find a way to profit from this, it's realistic. The crocodile tears, the head scarf, the voldemorting, the raison d'etre for making laws the government wanted to make anyway.
Don't you americans remember all of this from the 9/11 aftermath?
What he wanted - again according to the manifesto - is exactly what he's getting: further division and a clamping down on gun laws.
She also legally has to do it I believe, as Tarrant is still the "suspect" and has not been formally found guilty. She's opportunistically trying to turn this restriction into some epic "I un-name thee!" cringe fest.
HN is a bit of an echo chamber, unfortunately.
I have a better relationship with corporations more than governments. A corporation has never harassed me at an airport when trying to leave. If I don't like MacDonalds I can... stop eating at MacDonalds. If I don't like the services the state provides I have to physically remove myself.
I really should buy a 'clunky', 'heavy' laptop before they all disappear and all that's left are wafer thin machines with soldered-on everything.
And if my business was turning over $115k/Month I'm not sure I would let that keep me awake at night.
No losing your house, no alimony... maybe they were on to something. Let wives also be able to sell their husbands and bring it back!
So how would you get the first customers? I'm just some guy off the street, no one is going bet money on me performing a function for their business.
That's the only way to treat driving IMO. If you let yourself get upset at 'delays', you will drive rashly to make up for it, and eventually you will cause an accident.
Every time you get in a car you should expect delays, and expect dangerous driving from others.
It's a bit like saying Japan doesn't want to be Asian.
Absolutely, and I would never deny it.
I live in the first world, in a city of about 100,000. According to numbeo it's a bit cheaper to live here than Seattle, but much more expensive than Dallas. I earn just under $60,000 USD as a developer, which is considered a good salary here.
I think you drastically over estimate the first world as a whole.
I guarantee those people would be as well if they were effected by it personally. If you're not personally doing the kind of jobs an illegal immigrant can do for less, then you can only benefit - it lowers the cost to you for many things in your life. As a bonus, you get to pretend that makes you a good person.
An episode of South Park addresses this brilliantly, though people conveniently only remember the first part. Time travellers from the future come into South Park and take all the menial jobs. The blue collar americans yell "they took our jerbs!" Randy - a geologist - admonishes them as racists, until he finds out his own white collar positionhas been given to an alien, and then he too is complaining about how they took his job.
The day the wealthy Californian tech companies start hiring illegal immigrant developers at a lower cost is the day the echo chamber changes its tune.
This article wasn't about housing in the US, it was about housing in the UK.
I believe the US is one of the few OECD countries where housing is actually affordable, 3-4 times median income across the whole country IIRC.
People will find a way to keep people they don't want near by away from them.
With increased revenue from where, exactly?
I think it's utopian to believe that this would lead to anything but slums and shanty towns. People with no wealth will all flock to areas with wealth, which won't have the infrastructure to support them. They'd camp out wherever they could with whatever they could - possibly right outside your house. Probably in your back yard actually - local law enforcement would be too overwhelmed to go around persecuting squatting or trespassing.
Travel to a large city in India to see what happens when free movement is coupled with massive inequality.
Are you under the impression that China didn't?