20 karma · joined January 21, 2020
Anyway, I think monthly would be fine as long as it focused on career growth, goals, etc. I am a tad bit of biased since I have had bosses who use 1:1's to stay up to date with projects and work while ignoring the entire team and was on the golf course the rest of the week.
Of course I am not talking about deliberately keeping your boss in the dark, that is a problem for another thread. I am not for 1:1s being used for "phoning it in" from a lazy manager.
The losers are the farmers who have to clean that mess up. A lot happened and we are back at the exact same problem.
Question: does any of what happened in Chevron vs Donziger really matter?
When a manager has weekly 1:1 meetings, time to find a new job...and fast. That is a major red flag if the manager unable to keep track of the team OR upper management is getting ready for layoffs.
In fact, when go through the interview process once question I ask is are their views on 1:1 meeting, how often are they, are they mandated by upper management or just the manager's preference.
They are asking $200 for the commander x16 keyboard not to mention vaporware like the Mega65 that never might be released but seem to get lots of donations and endorsement from PC magazines (endorsements are free?)
I have seen broken VIC20s and ZX81s go for $300+ on eBay. Why?
I am not saying people should not buy this stuff and if they is what their hobby is...cool. My wife cannot understand why I buy the things I like. But those prices are only going to have the choir as the customers. They should be eating the cost of that keyboards and new gear to grow new customers.
For example, property taxes in Texas are legalized robbery. But in Ohio, property taxes are pretty low. But I get to pay state, and local city income taxes so my savings in that category is made up for in another. Same goes for food, rent, transportation, etc.
Sprawl has to do with annexation. Texas allows larger cities to annex smaller ones and that is how Houston is getting bigger via sprawl. Last thing Houston, Dallas, or Austin wants is to be locked in geographically. Houston would rather go to court to fight Dallas to annex a city than build skyscrapers used for housing.
It's money and power. Cost of living...eh...