143 karma · joined November 22, 2020
HAHA!
Our servers are still down, though
But, it can learn, albeit in a limited way, using the context. Though to my knowledge that doesn't scale well.
My observation is that the models are better at evaluating than they are generating, this is the technique used in the o1 models. They will use unaligned hidden tokens as "thinking" steps that will include evaluation of previous attempts.
I thought that was a good approach to vetting bad ideas.
why is that point fundamental?
But I think this is ego getting in the way, and our reluctance to change our minds.
We like to point to artificial intelligence and explain how it works differently and then say therefore it's not "true reasoning". I'm not sure that's a good conclusion. We should look at the output and decide. As flawed as it is, I think it's rather impressive
Edit: that came out way more condescending than I intentended
The danger is two fold
1. People don't eat fatty foods which have solid evidence for their benefits (e.g. Virgin olive oil)
2. People substitute the lack of fats with sugar, which I believe (not an expert) has a lot literature linking it with obesity
(I agree with you).
I wonder if a first pass with another model to expand these so called bad prompts into better prompts would work.
Of course, more interesting things happen when you get to 32b and the 70b param models, which will require high end chips like 3090s.
Still, it's up for debate whether they are alive, regardless whether it's the same way that cells are alive
I've used CSS, and Tailwind and not worrying about naming everything correctly and not skipping around different files is a dream for me. Perhaps that's my brain, Idk.
Further I have gone over old code, and haven't had any problem with maintainability
My opinion is it isn't binary, rather it's a scale. Your example is a point on the scale higher than what it is now.
But perhaps that's too liberal a definition of "reasoning" , no idea.
We seem to move the goalposts on what constitutes human level intelligence as we discover the various capabilities exhibited in the animal kingdom. I wonder if it is/will be the same with AI
I guess what I'm really asking, what would you expect to observe to make it not illusory?
Edit
> Not sure why you’re framing this thread by different HNers as an attack somehow and your last statement feels judgmental.
I wasn't talking about the criticisms themselves, heck, I agree with them. I was more referring to the fact someone felt entitled to a good user experience they got angry.
Perhaps I'm being oversensitive on behalf of the guy who put effort into releasing this. But this isn't isolated, often people get punished for putting something out there that does not have a certain level of polish, I think that's totally counterproductive.