> drinking up water for data centers
As long as your law allows it, it's not Google's liability. Just change the law. But you call regulations "communism".
430 karma · joined November 14, 2023
As long as your law allows it, it's not Google's liability. Just change the law. But you call regulations "communism".
and paying enterprise customers.
Discover shell aliases... You only need to remember "port"...
This is for Linux
alias port="sudo ss -tulnp"
alias port="sudo lsof -nP -i -sTCP:LISTEN"Trying to remember 100 digits of pi won't give you any advantage in cognitive functions apart from memorizing 100 digits of pi, for a little while. Better spend your time elsewhere.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/edu/news/how-many-decimals-of-pi-do...
I apparently define cool people differently :joy:
> Imagine applying for a SF startup job
No, thanks :joy:
Therefore I agree with manufacturer's decision.
Writing allocators for domain-specific access patterns is easy. Writing a general-purpose high performing, stable allocator with bounded P99 latency is hard.
Give your friend, Dunning–Kruger, some better pills to keep him from speaking through you.
Second. How would that LLM-based query optimizer work in a real-world 10,000 qps ERP system with very large shape of queries? I'm not saying it's useless, it just won't replace a real query planner soon. Latencies would skyrocket.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-odd
https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-even
https://www.npmjs.com/package/left-pad
root@71a8c5a6c5e3:/# mkdir -p $(yes a/ | head -n $((32 * 1024)) | tr -d '\n')
mkdir: File name too long
root@71a8c5a6c5e3:/# gnumkdir -p $(yes a/ | head -n $((32 * 1024)) | tr -d '\n')
gnumkdir: cannot create directory 'a/a/a/.../a/a': File name too long
root@71a8c5a6c5e3:/# gnumkdir -p $(yes a/ | head -n $((3 * 1024)) | tr -d '\n')
root@71a8c5a6c5e3:/# rm -rf a
rm: cannot remove 'a/a/a/.../a/a/a': Directory not empty
root@71a8c5a6c5e3:/# gnurm -rf a
root@71a8c5a6c5e3:/# rm -rf a
root@71a8c5a6c5e3:/#
WHY DO I HAVE TO CONSIDER SWAP in 2026?
Then there is this company that provides "customers" access to so-called "residential proxies," that is your home networks, to which they gained access in sneaky ways, essentially forming a large botnet. Then they allow the "customers" to use that your network to illegally scrap content, download who-knows-what using your IP address and making you responsible for that.
Yeah, those are "sponsors" I could certainly trust and recommend. Sure. Shame on you bloggers and youtubers.
And no, Chrome never "bought an ad-tech company, collected data on users, and used chrome to push personalized ads, or the addition of anti-features and questionable design choices that force users to hunt for and modify poorly documented settings". NEVER IN THE WORLD. That's why you use it.
If it's just about that, fix those low priority issues and bundle them along with the next higher-priority fix pack, i.e. "lower than low" -> fix but not release immediately; "medium" or higher -> release with any earlier unreleased "lower than low" fixes.
Seeing how much energy you spent in dismissing the person's report on the "lower than low" vuln in https://hackerone.com/reports/3455037, it'd be easier and faster to just fix it rather than argue...
I think it's the "secure screen" that cannot be manipulated by the malware in a VM. I'd expect a password entry dialog to also be handled like that.
Don't you have other e-commerce sites?
OK, in '70s, '80s or '90s when compute and storage resources were limited and every bit counted, specialized formats did make sense.
But nowadays we'd save enormous efforts by just packaging stuff in SQLite databases. Microsoft's proprietary file formats (Office, Power BI etc.), OpenOffice/LibreOffice OpenDocument format, or almost everything else would fit perfectly.
Documents, files, are all data (called "data files", aren't they?), including executables, which as can be seen in this article are also databases.
Are they? They provide AI overview to majority of web searches, and that alone requires enormous resources. Anthropic, OpenAI and others only serves their AI customers. Regarding the power of their model, my own experiences are that it doesn't fall behind. I've done many successful projects already, including quite a big one in Pascal. So no, I don't feel any difference between Gemini and others. I think it's just a long lasting fashion to whine about Google and its services.
Go find bugs that haven't been yet found, and then brag about them :joy:
I wonder whether I'll be able to live my nice life to the end like I planned before Altman released his first model, or will it all end in a global disaster soon.