1,162 karma · joined June 9, 2008
The only question is: Is most click fraud happening on google, or other advertisers? This could be where google succeeds, "we have 10% of our competitor's click fraud, we are the trusted network"
Can I paten a technique for saving people's lives that requires no tools and anyone can learn, but no human being has ever done it before (intentionally)?
The paten question is no triviality and should not be treated as such. Don't think "oh why don't they just revoke it". Perhaps what is wrong with our system is the time given, 7 years in software terms may as well be a lifetime, while 7 years in physical product terms is hardly anything. Thats the problem with our system. And copyright is a whole nothing monster. They mingle often, but are not the same.
RubyMine costs money. The reason my team uses it is for the refactoring tools and autocompletion capabilities. Though they do fight with it more often than not. According to them the refactoring tools makes it worth it.
I like Aptana 3. The problem is that the current version is not that incredible (a few quite annoying bugs), however I am waiting for good refactoring support.
Was a fun read. Works well in software development, just know when to draw the line at ensure it works (people might not die due to our failure, unless you are writing pacemaker code)
Now heres one interesting thing... if you think "eat whatever you want and you will lose weight" is bullshit, consider this: I used to love drinking soda. Drank it by the gallons. I stopped due to weight gain. Now I don't crave it, I am mostly repulsed by it, and am quite happy just drinking water, in fact I can drink whatever I want because I want water.
Over time your mindset will change, you simply got used to a lifestyle of excessive eating and thus... "I don't want to give up my donuts in the morning". Just eating fruits daily makes me repulsed by eating processed sweets (donuts and the like) because there is so much more and better flavor out there that is not due to just adding tons of sugar.
Wikileaks is not even in the picture here. This is pure 1st amendment issue. A provider can provide a completely unfair advantage in the "open" market to another company over their competitors. Imagine if television networks could chose to only show republican campaign messages, and ignore all democrat ones. Its the same issue.
Thats the strategy (xept for the last part).
I can't think of any other rationale that will keep my sanity.
When you have a job where the masses cannot achieve it simply by going through school, and finding a worker is very hard as the right one is one in a handfull, and a good worker can save tons of money for companies, or even make companies, or do wonders, I am in no surprise about this.
My wife is a speach pathologist. Don't get my wrong I am in no way playing down her job. She had to study for more than I did, and it is no easy task. However now that she has a job, her interview is "when can you start" literally. There are too many jobs for speech pathologists; they are needed everywhere. And too little speech pathologists out there.
So basically when the demand is a lot higher than the supply, that job will be the best one to be in. As many studies and as tons of experience notes it, many programmers can't program. Which means that for the good ones, work is easy to find. The technological boom has just started... what 10 years or so of heavy tech advances that penetrated our culture, and 30 years of just advances? Everyone wants a piece of the pie but as people realize you need the right people.
I remember during the dot com burst, many of my family friends were getting laid off, could not find work. My family was telling me that programming is a dead end job that you DONT want to be in. I stood my ground, and it was worth it. However it is most definitely not for everyone. Those getting fired left and right who cold not get another job, yea they had their 1 year of training in "programming" and could not tell you what a thread is to save their life.
The senate is critical and not to be abolished.
Reminds me of a Frankin quote: "Sir, I disagree with you, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it."
Agnostic: Does not follow any particular religion, does believe in god or gods.
To me linux is everything under the hood. The File System, The Kernel, the Open Sourcing of the two, and everything built on top of that.
"I can't stand linux" only tells me that you need to log off from the internet because guess what most is run on.
So I guess if you are saying android is the phone to run on a bunch of random hardware which will outsell apple, yes, android is the new windows of cellphones. In the end it's closer to a user-friendly linux.
Post 9/11 though the patriot act has done some unholy horrors to our due process.
Long story short, innocent until proven guilty. Not vice versa.
a) Write bad code (you barely know the syntax)
b) Get really confused, and thus either start hating it, or simply not able to take full advantage of the framework.
c) Do roundabout ways to solve a problem when there is a very simple solution, but you not understanding the language still made the mistake.
d) Hit a big brick wall when looking at code others made.
I made this sort of mistake before. It is a bad mistake to make.
However to note: jQuery makes dom manipulation fairly easy. It is in no way a replacement to javascript, only the browser's dom lib calls. You just wind up not writing a bunch of utility functions to handle the different ways to get at the same information in the browser. Plus I like the syntax.