There is nothing wrong with citing 4chans shopping cart theory.
It is truly a marker of good vs bad people as far as it comes to participating in a high trust society.
2,242 karma · joined February 26, 2014
There is nothing wrong with citing 4chans shopping cart theory.
It is truly a marker of good vs bad people as far as it comes to participating in a high trust society.
Does not imply a belief of innocence.
Odd I got the update 2 weeks before M5 launch.
Software as a means to obsolete hardware.
Trillion dollar company
The USA is big, but China bigger. If the USA over optimizes on reducing greenhouse gas today, at the expense of our long term economic and world power, China, who cares for less about preserving the world will continue to destroy the world and claim the most power simultaneously.
So while we can reduce OUR footprint by taking ourselves out of the game, the world still loses.
So now try to find a less myopic solution where we remain powerful enough to get the whole world to tamper down their impacts.
We don't win by removing ourselves from the competition. And the competition has a high chance of killing us all. But rolling over is a guaranteed way to lose everything everywhere.
Oh and the prior commitments like the Paris accord were engineered to harm us while allowing China to dominate.
Yes the barrier for entry is low, but there is a very high ceiling as well
I've been recording myself on guitar and using suno to turn it into professional quality recordings with full backing band.
And I'm not trying to sell it, I just like hearing the ideas in my head turned into fully fleshed music of higher quality than I could produce with 100x more time to invest into it
Reality is you sometimes have to drop some dead weight for 2% of people to protect and further the lives of the other 98%.
Turns out it would have been better to find alternative solutions for those 2% back when they were only 0.2%, but instead Dems made them the center of attention and is now staking the future of our country on continued pacification of an increasingly violent 'underserved' social blight.
Drop the T. Protect children. Enforce laws in our urban murder cities... Or continue to lose the culture war. If you turn to violence during this process it will be worse for many more people than the 2% being staked for protection currently.
I am 100% convinced people who are not getting value from AI would have trouble explaining how to tie shoes to a toddler
I guarantee your internal tools are not revolutionary, they are just unrepresented in the ML model out of the box
This is a solvable geo regulation issue, solvable like many other geo regulatory issues
My org has 160 engineers working on our e-commerce frontend and middle tiers. I constantly dive into repos and code I have no ownership of. The gitblame shows a contractor who worked here 3 years ago frequently.
Seems LLM does good in small, bad in medium, good again as small modules within big.
The committee is under the control of HHS Secretary... JFK. He literally has the authority to do what he did.
Changing a plan you inherited but now own is not illegal.
I have gone from Senior II, to Lead Architect, to Principal Engineer in the years LLMs have been available.
It's not literally a 100x multiplier, but I have leveraged their ability to both fill in details where I lack specific knowledge, and as a first point of contact when researching a new space.
LLMs have enabled me to widen my sphere of influence by deepening my abilities at every point of my T-shaped knowledge curve.
I suspect the opposition party is literally just fear-bombing social media with what ifs and AI slop to further divide folks.
But if some conferences or even colleges full of people susceptible to that kind of misinformation begin to fail, I'm all for it.