69 karma · joined December 25, 2021
Using it for 4 years, both at home and at work (also have Raspberry Pi 4 under Arch Linux ARM).
I'm a bit perplexed why it is considered less stable than "your typical Linux distro". Never used Debian, but I used Ubuntu with KDE prior to Arch. It was very common to have problems, from constant messages about crashing staff (AppArmor hitting the record) to reinstalling the entire OS. During 4 years with Arch I had only a few tiny issues that required 5-10 minutes to fix (not least thanks to Arch Wiki).
Not sure though if this is because Arch is so nice by itself, or because with Arch I moved to more minimalist setups (which Arch endorses so naturally).
UPD: But cash is still accepted in most cases. Have no idea why some people still use it.
But all other alternatives for bibliography management I know of are even worse.
"The best films are like dreams you're never sure you've really had. I have this image in my head of a room full of sand. And a bird flies towards me, and dips its wing into the sand. And I honestly have no idea whether this image came from a dream, or a film"
In what way does is suck? I have about 1TB of audio files on local disks, which I manage with beets + mpd. No troubles at all.
And, if you didn't know - the first thing Tokayev did in 2019 when Nazarbayev (the first president who ruled almost 30 years) handed the rein to him - is that he proposed to rename the Kazakhstani capital, Astana, to Nur-Sultan (Nazarbayev's first name). And of course, the Parliament unanimously supported the idea. Not a single member objected.
Few months ago it was "proposed" by someone from the Parliament (of course, not as an own initiative, hence quotes) to rename the capital back to Astana, and Tokayev supported. The parliament voted unanimously. Not a single member objected.
I do agree that things seem better in Kazakshtan now than they were even a decade ago, or even than they are now in most other post-Soviet countries. But it's still way too far...