The argument for CO2 reduction has always been that all the extra carbon released from coal, gas, and petroleum, is bad, as a net increase of emissions, beyond natural processes.
72 karma · joined April 24, 2024
Galatians 4:16
The argument for CO2 reduction has always been that all the extra carbon released from coal, gas, and petroleum, is bad, as a net increase of emissions, beyond natural processes.
Notice how I didn't say "FDA bad", but just asked a question, which was effectively answered.
This sort of infered bickering is not conducive to civil discussion.
You seem to have selective comprehension issues.
Recycling is more than just throwing trash into different coloured bins and burning oil to process it; Specifically, recycling in my comment refers to the process of water and air turning into food, and back into water and air, as has been customary for terran life for a few years now.
It is quite simply a natural cycle using no oil for centuries, vs. an industrial cycle using millions of tons of oil per year.
Stealing devices is still theft.
"There are no solutions …only tradeoffs."
—Thomas Sowell
Also, likely they had infrastructure available, from the nuclear power they use.
Or, you know, just make your own open-source search engine, with blackjack and hookers.
1. https://hackaday.com/2022/04/02/monitoring-water-quality-usi...
Same goes for corporations, especially bigger ones.
Hypothesis > (test) > Theory
The conspiracy among three Physicists, now known as the Manhattan Project, with hundreds of thousands of unknowing participants, with whole new sectors of industries, and supply chains, brought us new medicine, nuclear power, and peace through mutually assured destruction, yet people seem to think of conspiracy as some harebrained concept spun up by halfwits.
Having a language that can not be machine translated, may be beneficial. [1]
1. https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/navajo-code-talkers-and-th...