The next years after would still be as bad as predicted
2,225 karma · joined August 15, 2018
The next years after would still be as bad as predicted
FCC subsequently fined them $900k.
[0] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363486A1.pdf
[1] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-satellite-fine-idUSKC...
JWTs location in L2 (a mathematically unstable location that requires energy to not roll back into a gravity well in any direction) is like putting it on the satellite equivalent of K2 and not coming down from the peak for 20 years and you compare it to the thousands of commuters that made it up the hill down the road from your house.
Core R&D, hardware, B2B services, networking companies, etc. and then also the factor of geographic places that aren't considered "sexy" in the HN crowd revert to the mean for that geographic area in regards to the mix of political leanings.
I disagree it's about hard work, but about ego about how society deserves to value them. That correlates only really under the age of 35 before their first health scare when suddenly society owes something to them that they never previously wanted to feed a cent into.
I'm just not gutsy enough to short the stocks until then.
One thing I am now on the look out for is for short-term short squeezes before initial lockup periods expire.
Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope.
aaaand...
Nope. Plans for it, but not yet in production.
Oh and before anyone starts, not in transitive dependencies either. Just good old bare metal EC2 instances without vendor lock in.
To stick to the analogy I guess:
Lawyers -> Engineers
Policy Writers -> Architects
Politicians -> Executives, Directors, Sales and Marketing
Judges -> QA
And people who espouse that we don't need laws or lawyers to run our society are making about as coherent sense as saying we can ship a unicorn entirely on no-code and without engineers. It's in the realm of possibilities, maybe, but it will be a house of cards ready to implode unless this mantra is, at best, sheepishly abandoned half way through the endeavor.
Dumping at the start of that meeting out of the blue this criteria, is not a two-way street equal reciprocation of that respect. If you'd kill for ten candidates, you can have him. I've had ~230 for 2 position this week and I'm testing for EQ also. Maybe changing requirements on people at the last minute fits in your work culture.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29701155/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-65908-y
But can't say I've been following Youtube videos or Reddit on the matter.
Edit: I didn't know who the youtube video you linked is, but a cursory google bring up that he is accused of quackery. Also, the source on that video is... his own website hosting his own work. Not exactly peer review is it?
Reduce fat intake.
It's not the cause, but the carrier of toxins across the blood-brain carrier. Reducing fat would reduce the rate of toxin build up. It's not a cure, nor does it tackle the genetic component, but way to prolong lifestyle.
One project started in 2007 planning activation in 2025 and planning reactions in 2035. The other started in 2015, activated 2017 and steady state reactions have been delayed from the original Sept 2021 plan to 2022. It's not even close the results so far.
But yeah, I'm also phasing out my google usage. Personally getting off gmail and professionally migrating off firebase and already refuse to work with GCP in any capacity.