4,307 karma · joined May 24, 2012
Software Engineer based in Berlin.
The username is a reference to a mythical snake found in Central Indian Highlands.
Twitter: @samkhawase
email: sam dot khawase @gmail
[my public key: https://keybase.io/samkhawase; my proof: https://keybase.io/samkhawase/sigs/1q1gmkKlBt4bU_c9axiE0VUYIQjAXgLxl_u9Pkd7hBQ ]
Funnily enough I’ve given enough examples and sources already in this thread. I think it’s better than “I know someone who knows” and “it’s expert vetted research”. I’ll stick to my theory about Sanskrit/Prakrit diglossia for now.
In the end we are two lay people arguing about a topic we’re not experts in and speculating how things would have been few millennia ago. It’s fine to have diverse perspectives! I’m not sure which quacks you deal with but I wish you all the best.
आ नो भद्राः क्रतवो यन्तु विश्वतः
> historical changes in Sanskrit used in the Vedas.
This is just one small corpus of Sanskrit linguistic traditions. It hardly gives them expertise over the rest of the traditions spanning few millennia.
Jains, Buddhists and various other Sramana movements were championed by lower varnas and they all used Sanskrit as a liturgical language.
I have already mentioned the widespread presence of edicts, danapatra, inscriptions, secular literature created for wider public which hints that Sanskrit was widely understood and Sanskrit/Prakrit Diglossia is not too far fetched.
Sanskrit enjoyed scholarship since 6th BCE and it was prevalent and commonly used for more than a millennia after that.
The various inscriptions found across the subcontinent, and meant for common people are in Sanskrit which disproves this idea that it was not widely used.
Diglossia is very common in Indian culture and it is not far fetched to imagine Indians speaking Sanskrit and Prakrits fluently and switching them based on context.
You can find minor examples of it even today if you look at public announcements, which are done in Sanskrit inspired verbiage.
Sanskrit was widely spoken and understood just like Latin or Avestan, in its heyday. Otherwise it wouldn’t be part of the liturgical traditions of Buddhism, Jainism and Nastika traditions.
Why would Sudraka,Vatsayana, Brhathari write in Sanskrit if no one spoke it?
This would be a big hit in European cities. I own VW e-Up! and it's a perfect EU city car. With it's 375KM range, I rarely charge it more than once a month.
I wrote about my experience in cross compiling zig on an old kindle some time ago.
I run my micro-homelab on a Pi Zero from 2018. It’s behind Cloudflare tunnels. It runs the apps i need on a DietPi OS within 180MB and it’s uptime is ~8 months.
You seem to be in the arena and have skin in the game. Would love to read your blog on these topics.
They actually spoke Chagatai Turkish in the households and Persian was the court language. Urdu developed independently, mostly outside the royal patronage, and much later.
Fun fact: They called themselves "Gurkhaniye" and not "Mughals". It was a term mostly popularized by rivals like Marathas (which is also an exonym)
> few dynasties were comparable to the vastness of Mughals
The Mauryas perhaps ruled a much larger area than Mughals. Khalji, Tughlaqs, Satvahanas, and Marathas also ruled over vast landscapes, but they are not much known outside India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maratha_Empire#/media/File:Ind...
Reminds me of this decade old post (and discussion) by Graydon Hoare, "Always bet on text".
The Deccan Sultanates and Vijayanagara were more relevant to world history in the 16th Century India. The wonders of Bijapur, Golconda and Hampi would put 16th CE Delhi to shame.
You’re absolutely right!
Jokes apart, I did notice GLM doing these back and forth loops.
I had the same thought when I read this part. The $6MM investment on Agent Mail is in serious trouble right now.
I just installed llama.cpp on CachyOS after reading this article. It’s much faster and better than Ollama.