Fidelix

> it's literally a feature that cannot be found with GUIs Yes, it can.

Cursor has this, and there are others that can attach to ssh or open their UI via a tunnel or web interface.

SSH is mighty convenient though, so I am not necessarily saying your point is incorrect.

Did you even check what hash they are using?

No need to announce

Why these animations in the github README? why? It just made understanding anything more difficult

That's fine, then there is no need to lie like you did.

Yes, repost

Can you clarify? I tested a few and they are rubbish and don't have the same features.

MacOS only. May this help you skip a click.

Why would one need to self-host TBs of content with Usenet? That makes no sense.

It's also a lot less prone to failures than debrid services, especially with old content.

Freerdp (which this project and every other similar one depends on) is 100% broken on wayland for this use case. I'm not going back to X11.

It would probably beneficial for you to distinguish an is from an ought.

The OP was descriptive, not prescriptive.

Unbelievable... Good job mate.

Can't wait until one day this gets into Moonlight or something like it.

"It's a hot mess" - someone who knows absolutely nothing about what they're talking about.

Typical HN comment about php.

Try Niri or PaperWM. A scrolling window manager.

They are upvoting because they hate Elon Musk. It's not that deep.

Yes. Every single transaction is open for the government to inspect. There is zero privacy in pix in relation to government surveillance.

According to Wikipedia, RDP = June 16, 1998 SSH = 1995. OpenSSH = 1999

Any links to share? I don't care about security for my use case.

yes, that. it was a typo. Thanks

Because people that make an effort of announcing these things are all about virtual signaling.

Nothing they do ever has real substance to it.

> pushing everyone else to provide for themselves what they had previously got from the US

Did you write this, review it, then post it as if that's a bad thing? wow

edit: grammar

> The moment I made up my mind about this was reading the following words written by a maintainer within the kernel community:

> "we are the thin blue line"

> This isn't okay. This isn't creating an inclusive environment. This isn't okay with the current political situation especially in the US. A maintainer speaking those words can't be kept. No matter how important or critical or relevant they are. They need to be removed until they learn. Learn what those words mean for a lot of marginalized people. Learn about what horrors it evokes in their minds.

I opened the article relatively certain about the nature of the complaint. 100% confirmed.

Seriously? Really? It seems Herbst is the one that wants a non-inclusive environment (ie. exactly conforming to his personal political preferences). Additionally this looks like an excuse as he was already admittedly burned out.

In any case, good luck to Herbst in his future endeavors, hopefully he can develop a thicker skin.

No. It's a disaster. The poor pay for the richest to go to public universities. See Brazil.

There are more low-income people in private universities (with private or private/public loans) than in public universities.

Consider that his position might be more profound than you considered it to be.

Mine is. It's about incentives. Now you can take it from there, and at least in my interpretation the rest of your rebuttal falls apart.

There is absolutely no equivalency to slavery. That is simply dishonest. Slaves didn't choose to be slaves. Do students who take on debt have no agency whatsoever to you? Did the people who paid such debts had no agency when paying?

Yeah, and the EFF is in no way biased. at all.

That's a fair point, but scaling it vertically can take you very far in my experience.

That's different from "killing" the product / technology, which is what Google does.

What a silly notion. You're not affiliated to a company merely because you are their customer.

I don't think that word "conservatism" mean what you think

Not true at all. No red paint in it.

This has been conclusively, scientifically debunked multiple times.