2,410 karma · joined July 2, 2022
Humans will never cure diseases, humans will never fly, humans will never go to space, etc.
I'm skeptical of this often cited claim. The more you use it the greater the evolutionary pressure you place and the more you force evolved resistance. If you overuse an antibiotic, you kill off all of the bacteria that could compete with the resistant strains, thus strongly promoting resistance.
I posit that like with all other evolutionary pressures, reducing the pressure is the right approach.
(Or if you use emacs, then you already have a full editor in your shell)
If you think that, you aren't reviewing human code closely enough IMO. Human code and AI code should be scrutinized equally closely. Or rather, if you're relying on where you think the code came from rather than actually, y'know, reviewing the code itself, then you aren't doing a good job.
IMO this is like wanting to dump the intermediate state of an LLVM compilation and expecting to reliably resume it across platforms.
As an analogy, students learn a bunch of things during school, become more intelligent, but do not retain explicit knowledge like all of the details on the periodic table, or all of the exact formulas for things.
First of all this is just blatantly not true (e.g. MSM ignoring politically inconvenient news). Second of all what is important varies for each person. e.g., local news or news about your specific interests
> I think small communities where people actually have to maintain a reputation are the future, and the past.
This is what social media is (was?)
For most people, video games are about relaxing/unwinding, not embarking on a creative DnD roleplay with "real" consequences.
This is also why linear stories are so much more popular than "choose your own adventure" or "audience participation".