425 karma · joined July 11, 2016
Regarding regulations we are studying two possible scenarios, comply with all or simply Uberize the model and let people sell money for a fee. For the former we need tons of money, attorneys and on/off ramps with the banking world. For the latter we only would be the messaging transport and people would buy and sell money informally, that's the long tail of the unbanked and informal merchants.
We're at a very early stage and looking for investors.
Does that discard the creation of remittance apps? That's not selling, that's just sending money between parties. I was thinking on sending money around the world using WhatsApp, is that allowed?
If you combine N as all possible numerators with N as denominators you get that cardinality of Q = N * N
Also, I don't accept the diagonal argument as proof. Given all possible combinations of numbers, any given number will occur in that set no matter what. If you add special rules of course it falls apart and Cantor's argument is just a special rule.
If we use fruits as an example, taking a diagonal from their letters won't form a fruit either.
1. [A]PPLE
2. O[R]ANGE
3. MA[N]GO
4. CHE[R]RY
:
N. ARNR ?Infinity is a tricky subject.
There are infinite naturals, fractions and decimals but they are different kinds of infinities. If we define natural positives as N and both positive and negatives as the same infinities N * 2 (with a minus sign), we can safely say that decimals are simply all naturals multiplied by infinity N * N * N * 2 or N ^ 3 * 2 where for every single integer like 0, 1 or 2 there will be infinite decimals after the point prefixed by infinite zeroes too like .1 .01 .001 .0001 and even if N * 2 or N ^ 3 are equal to infinity (infinity because we can't measure it or at least not know its final boundary) both infinities are different.
And guessable, we're out of hell someday.
You can't survive in a competitive world with just 10% of the market share since interconnectedness is crucial for the dominance of any platform and that's why you need cheaper macs and phones without losing the appeal of high end products for those who have the money in times of economic duress like the ones to come.
It is neither a hammer nor a nail, it just works for some specific purposes.
Nice detail.
W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9
SPR 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
SUM 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
AUT 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
WIN 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 [1]
We could also name all days of the week after the eight planets and the sun as initially intended (including moonday). We could have seven working days and three days off or three working days then two off then three more working days then two off per week.
Whatever, just wanted to leave a stinky brainfart in this room for posterity.
print, print, print
print, input, print
print, input, if print, else print
print, input, for print
func, print func
A couple of days ago I was ordering a pizza by phone and they told me they had a whatsapp channel to take orders so I thought paying using whatsapp would be perfect. No need for annoying ads or invasive data collection.
Why creating Tethers from thin air is now a cause of concern? That's a coin just like every coin out there, like Tron, Verge, EOS, they're created from nothing by a program, they have the value the market decides it has and the creator has all the right to print all the coins they want just like everybody else.
And the market has decided USDT has more value than all other coins combined as it is number two in volume just behind BTC.
People use USDT as a safe harbor when markets collapse, it has its use, a very valuable use. Of course they will print trillions if they could, everybody would print trillions of their shitty coins and cash out tanking the market if they could, that's the nature of cryptocurrencies.
I fail to see why people complain about Tether (highly valuable) and not about the rest of the scam coins that are draining the market from stupid money.
That's a billion dollar market waiting for disruption.