85 karma · joined December 5, 2018
Eep. No. At least, not in anything public. Universal impl trait arguments can't be turbofished, so you're placing an unnecessary constraint on your caller.
Eventually I was able to track down the underlying laws that the relevant rules were based on and call the head office in Charleston who put things right, but who knows what would've happened had I not been a native English speaker.
Some of this may have changed, it looks like "8 FAM 403.1-4(D)" would've been the rule that I needed back when I did this, and it does not appear to be currently classified, but lots of other rules still are. Point is, it may not be as simple as you'd think to "just" get a new passport.
In the early days, the internet was seen as a massively playfield-leveling and decentralizing force ("the net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it"), not a massively centralizing one (Facebook is the world's only newspaper).
In a model where everything is decentralized and leveled , no player is big enough to worry about.
Isn't that what `#[non_exhaustive]` is for?
Probably Kathi Goertzen?
And then there was that day Google accidently deleted everyone's router configuration.
It worked great as a dumb access point. Everything else was shambles.
For a change of pace, look at Ian Hubert's "lazy tutorials". Each one is only one minute long but simultaneously shows something amazing while making it seem like anybody could just pick up the tool and do it.
It's also an (increasingly common) misuse of the term as originally coined.
Originally it referred to things like cashiers needing to remain calm and cheery even in the face of unreasonable and hostile customers. The claim is that this kind of labor goes beyond the job description and should therefore be compensated.
Like you say, the point of this article is that there's a lot of "there" there, but it takes more digging to find that NYT was willing to invest.