38,419 karma · joined February 4, 2010
But we can say that if it will be overturned, it's already wrong. (unless the overturning is the wrong one, yadda yadda)
We do not have to wait to use basic logic.
And judges do not always work on "the best of our society's knowledge". Some judges have massive biases. They make incorrect rulings that we can see, and sometimes the incorrectness is not only obvious but objective, like when multiple judges are on a case and some dissent; they can't all be right.
GiB is unambiguously the big one, power of two. You want S3 to be priced in dollars per GiB. "shrinkflation power of ten GiB" is getting it backwards.
This is very different from the idea that the savings are a few percent. In almost all cases the savings are nothing or a large fraction.
Really? No, it's not a few percent.
They could charge 10x-ish as much as T1 ISPs and cover all those costs and still have it be almost all profit.
Maybe maybe bringing their own IP would have solved the problem, but Cloudflare was obstructing everything and then did a cutoff without proper warning. It was really bad on Cloudflare's part.
And you're going to have to pay $15 of storage costs for your terabyte.
Peertube has moderation.
But the example you have isn't quite that bad. Yes the models are way too likely to rationalize their way into bad actions in the pursuit of achieving their task, and it's hard to figure out how to fix that. But the example of "that must not be for me" was a tool call, not exceeding access, and it only did that after they specifically trained it that failing that tool call was good.
As for upside, is fewer ads enough to tempt you? That's the easiest one to do if the fast servers need much less bandwidth.
By the mid-90s we were 50 years after the end of the war. It didn't take three generations to put the cities and infrastructure back together.
Also corner shops should be allowed everywhere.