Conformance enforcement only gets you more of the same behaviour. It denies access to variation that engenders innovation.
Exploration vs exploitation.
60 karma · joined July 10, 2008
Conformance enforcement only gets you more of the same behaviour. It denies access to variation that engenders innovation.
Exploration vs exploitation.
That's what you get for replacing the worlds largest generation, the Boomers, with the worlds smallest generation, the Zoomers.
I'm curious how you got 108mb. Here's what I'm seeing:
$ flutter --version
Flutter 3.0.4 • channel stable •
https://github.com/flutter/flutter
Framework • revision 85684f9300 (7 days ago) • 2022-06-30 13:22:47 -0700
Engine • revision 6ba2af10bb
Tools • Dart 2.17.5 • DevTools 2.12.2
$ flutter create hello_world && cd hello_world
Creating project hello_world...
Running "flutter pub get" in hello_world... 1,764ms
Wrote 127 files.
All done!
In order to run your application, type:
$ cd hello_world
$ flutter run
Your application code is in hello_world/lib/main.dart.
$ flutter build macos
Building with sound null safety
Building macOS application...
$ du -ah build/macos/Build/Products/Release/hello_world.app | tail -1
44M build/macos/Build/Products/Release/hello_world.app
Note, the release build is significantly smaller than the debug build, which includes a full Dart VM for hot swapping application code: $ flutter build macos --debug
Building with sound null safety
Building macOS application...
$ du -ah build/macos/Build/Products/Debug/hello_world.app | tail -1
98M build/macos/Build/Products/Debug/hello_world.app
Note, on the glacial compiles, here is what I'm seeing on my M1 mac laptop: $ time flutter build macos
Building with sound null safety
Building macOS application...
flutter build macos 1.20s user 0.59s system 47% cpu 3.801 total
It's slower than building web pages in vim, but this is comparable with compiling desktop applications in Xcode.Disclosure: I'm a Developer Relations Engineer for Flutter
Disclosure: I'm a Developer Relations Engineer for Flutter
You can construct API keys that are restricted to an Android signing key, use it for the duration of the class, and then revoke it after the course work is done.
A lot of people don't. I have many people who have me on speed dial for when they feel like tossing their laptops out the window. It's for these people that the iPad is designed.
All of this "death of tinkering" shows me that none of you guys actually take the time to understand people other than yourselves, and this whole movement speaks to just how self centered the whole geek tribe is.
It disturbs me.
Boys like talking about things, girls like talking about people. So the "listening better" actually becomes "understanding an alien mindset." I feel that this fact actually makes the above question sexist, because the two sexes involved interpret the action "listening" to mean two completely different things.
This will change when there are applications on the internet that corporates need, but can't access via IE6. See GWave for an example of how this can be resolved.