DetectDefect

> It is inconceivable for this demographic to think of a product that can enrich both the corporation and the users.

Would you care to provide an example of such a product, to dissuade this perceived demographic cohort? I am not so certain your creative name calling will yield much results, however.

Whole fruit, vegetables, nuts, seeds: the type of stuff our evolutionary biology is actually adapted to thrive on. If you cannot access the human food niche as a result of where you live, then grains, starches, rice and beans are all an adequate addition or even substitute.

> It’s just cut, fried and salted potato right? My morning omelette is more highly processed.

Both the omelette and chips are highly processed foods - not the real food you should be eating for optimal health.

You seem confused. The original claim that plants lack certain amino acids - or that eating them will somehow lead to a protein deficiency - was and is now again thoroughly debunked. The only reason people cling to the notion is to justify their inappropriate diet of animals.

> Soy has a lot of phytoestrogens so it’s not a great candidate to consume large amounts of.

The buffoonery continues. These irrational statements are straight out of the meat industry playbook - of course again lacking in any credible citations. And all you had to do was spend even 5 seconds reading a public encyclopedia to avoid this embarassment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phytoestrogen#Effects_on_human...

"we’ve worked with more than 260 physicians" yet not a single one of their names is proudly featured in this article. Well, the article itself does not even have an author listed. Imagine trusting someone who doesn't even disclose their identity with your sensitive data.

Dairy (the milk of another mammal's baby) only "makes sense" as a result of deep conditioning that it is normal, necessary and natural. Time to wake up from this lullaby.

How is that "like humans"? Rabbits and humans have completely different digestion and physiologies, the former relying on hindgut fermentation. No human has ever died from eating too much fruit, period.

Fruits, roots and vegetables. A tolerance for lactose is not an indication of optimal human food.

Now they do produce all the essential amino acids, but in insufficient amounts? Weird how the narrative keeps changing in this thread. A serious lack of scientific knowledge is apparent from people who insist on eating animals. And as always, it is devoid of any backing evidence or credibility other than "trust me, bro, I lift".

Or a tack - in case Wegmans tries to pull a polygraph on you.

"Enable JavaScript and cookies to continue"

The irony of being fingerprinted to read a blog about fingerprinting is apparently lost on Adafruit.

> There are almost no vegetables that are considered amino acid complete

This is just blatantly and hilariously false.

They are literally called "essential amino acids".

A plant would not survive if it lacked amino acids which are essential.

It it shocking anyone would deny this obvious and extremely basic fact about biology.

All of the false statements are loosely based on industry propaganda and are completely disjoined from any modern scientific consensus on nutrition.

> I believe you also don’t get a complete amino acids panel like you would with meat which is complete on its own.

You can challenge beliefs and do a modicum of research, which would easily disprove this false and frankly ridiculous notion, which defies even a rudimentary understanding of plant biology.

Protein overconsumption makes people sick, which in turn creates more victims^Wpatients to "treat".

Many (most?) human behaviors are thousands of years old, it does not make them reasonable. Also, refrain from hurling insults; just do not respond if you cannot materially substantiate your argument.

It is when it comes to slaughtering 80 billion sentient animals each year.

These evil people want us sick and hospitalized with chronic disease from eating this crap. Now that it's political, hopefully people will see it for the bullshit it really is.

I just told you: it's made by food industry interests and is ultimately divorced from actual nutrition science.

The Court has actually ruled that the USDA violated federal law by hiding conflicts of interest in the Dietary Guidelines.

It is beyond insane that these are the official guidelines on what Americans should eat. Why would anyone defend them?

It really is this simple and this chart of Net Worth Held by the Top 0.1% demonstrates it well -

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WFRBLTP1246

22/50 ~= half. No one claim it was half the population, other than you (strangely).

TIL Moody’s Analytics is "doomer FUD".

Which are crafted by individuals with strong financial ties to the meat, dairy, or egg industries, thus should be disregarded by any reasonable person.

> a guy made a bunch of money

Through the systemic abuse and exploitation of countless individuals' privacy and autonomy. The context is everything.

Likely Schmidt's repentance for his unbridled Burning Man trips.

Surely you jest as the animal agriculture industry is many times larger than any "big sugar" boogeyman.

Hot take? Half of the US is formally in recession already.

https://fortune.com/2025/10/09/america-feels-recession-state...

The economy is completely fucked and we are in a race to steal and horde all the data before people catch on.

Not necessary, this information is free:

https://finviz.com/calendar/economic/detail/UNITEDSTAJOBOFF?...

> Job openings in the US fell by 303,000 to 7.146 million in November 2025, the lowest since December 2020 and well below market expectations of 7.60 million. The number of job openings decreased in accommodation and food services (-148,000); transportation, warehousing, and utilities (-108,000); and wholesale trade (-63,000). On the other hand, openings increased in construction (+90,000). Meanwhile, hires were little changed and total separations were unchanged at 5.1 million each. Within separations, both quits (3.2 million) and layoffs and discharges (1.7 million) were little changed.

Dufus = Rufus, the obnoxious AI "helper" that takes up 20% of the screen when I search for something on Amazon, which no one asked for.