DataAF

Those of us under 30 never knew them either.

>This is the same image they used for their 2018 April Fools prank and faked a domain seizure.

The FBI is seizing domains for April Fools Day pranks? Does anyone else think that's an overreach?

Good catch. Mailchimp has better coverage in their TOS than most I've looked at.

True, but then it's on MailChimp to prove it. They're definitely open to arbitration. I wouldn't want to be in that position.

I can't imagine that either, but this isn't a case between Stefan and Mailchimp, this is a case between Stefan and Nandini in Tort Court where the requirements are much lower:

1. The existence of a contractual relationship or beneficial business relationship between two parties. Stefan is on mailchimp

2. Knowledge of that relationship by a third party.

3. Intent of the third party to induce a party to the relationship to breach the relationship. Tweet: https://twitter.com/nandoodles/status/1216903968439357446

4. Lack of any privilege on the part of the third party to induce such a breach. This is on Mailchimp's TOS

5. The contractual relationship is breached. Tweet: https://twitter.com/Mailchimp/status/1217073200414306304

6. Damage to the party against whom the breach occurs. This remains to be seen

Doesn't this open Nandini Jammi up to a Tortious interference lawsuit?

Sounds like Stefan and Mailchimp had a business arrangement and she's now a third party interfering with it (and bragging on twitter).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference

Location: Oakland, Ca

Remote: Yes, Please!

Willing to Relocate: No

Technologies: General ML & Data Science; Python, SciKit Learn, Keras, SQL, MongoDB, Flask; NLP tools like BERT, WordPiece, etc. ; AWS; Enough DevOps to run an ML pipeline

Resume: On Request

Email: bn.rn.99@gmail.com