149 karma · joined August 19, 2008
I'm adding this one to my quotes.txt
I'd like more people to talk about Ranked Pairs / Tideman. It satisfies a ridiculous number of voting criteria, even more than Schulze, but with the huge advantage that it's explainable to a layperson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_pairs
I believe it's cos(x). And I fail to see how that would change regardless of what unit x is expressed in. Sorry, my trig is veeery rusty.
I go camping once a year to connect with the environment; I wouldn't want to spend the 360-ish other days that way.
One thing I'm a bit puzzled about is why so many people here describe this as a dystopia or prison. This is super similar to the old utopian sci-fi designs from the 60s/70s. Sure today it seems a bit dated/naive, but hardly dystopian.
The carbon aspect is great, but I love how this attempts to address the unstable ground problem. Here in Quebec due to cheaply made road foundation and harsh freeze-thaw cycles, at this time of the year the roads have almost more potholes than... road.
My main question is, since this was published in 2009, has anyone tried to apply these recommendations? And if so, what has been the result? A priori it sounds like a very plausible model, but it needs to be tested.
I'm really puzzled by that statement. I don't see Quebec as having anything particularly different from other provinces that is harmful to startups. French? Everybody in Montreal speaks English anyway, and developing i18n software is super-trivial if you do it from the start; not something that would impact startup velocity in any meaningful way.
Or was this meant the other way around? That Quebec founders are disadvantaged in the same way that black and female founders are disadvantaged in SV?