28 karma · joined February 26, 2023
For example the line in the online editor:
This I<is> a B<text>
I find a little difficult to read at a glance.
The list items are also a bit visually "noisy" with every item needing its own "=itemX".
Is the plan to stick to the existing pod style rigidly or is there any potential flexibility for the syntax in the future?
I'm not saying it isn't valid criticism but I guess the way I work with an editor just isn't the same as others who experience this.
There are some GithHub-alikes, the most obvious is GitLab which you can also host yourself but all (or at least some of) the extras you get for free with GitHub are behind payment walls.
My current favourite is Codeberg, it uses Forgejo underneath (which is a fork of Gitea itself a fork of Gogs - all of which you can self host). Codeberg is run by a non-profit and are very much aligned with my ideals. They are also slowly adding nice features like their Woodpecker CI.
One that is growing in popularity and is a little less "GitHub-y" is SourceHut (which also has Mercurial support).
The main issue is that GitHub has really cornered the market. They give so much out for free that is difficult for others to compete with and it has become the de-facto place to host your project. This can mean that hosting anywhere other than GitHub will limit discoverability and contributions from people if they don't want to make an account or work out how to deal with whatever forge you are using.
However one thing that is coming that may help alleviate some of that is forge federation which will allow you to interact with various forges from your "home" forge - which hopefully prevents the need to make an account to make PRs or raise issues.
Edit: I see your other comment now, what could a better GitHub be that supports a better-than-git VCS. Well there did used to be places to host Darcs projects like the Darcs Hub but I don't know if some of the newers ones like Pijul or Jujutsu have any forge support yet.
Edit2: Oh it seems Pijul has "The Nest" for hosting.
I should point out this is a legacy system and for very good reasons we moved to an actual database a long time ago.
Same with Ghostty: https://mitchellh.com/ghostty
Atom had a delayed open sourcing but I don't know if this was planned, they had already open sourced some parts of it but not the whole editor: https://atom-editor.cc/blog/2014/05/06/atom-is-now-open-sour...
One thing that isn't clear to me is how to actually use the themes you can display with fx --themes.
My favoured terminal editor though is Helix which isn't represented.
Trilium has some really interesting features - very much powered by a single tree but no direct markdown, its a WYSIWYG editor (which is a bonus if you like that kind of thing).
Logseq is good if you prefer the "block based" type of notes - more like Notion.
Obviously there is Patreon but not sure if they also operate the same way and how much of a cut they take.
The other one I found interesting but doesn't really suit our needs was https://salt.bountysource.com/.