$25k is ridiculous, unless you make some guarantees, which you don't seem to do (wouldn't know, there's no relevant info for employers without signing up).
Please excuse the meta but I see articles from quartz and, while I won't comment on the content, their UX is awful for me. Am I alone here? Articles will often not load properly (this one loaded to an article about the BBC), and stuff moves that shouldn't be moving. I feel like qz is built to piss me off. Running Chrome, if that matters.
What? Why? If Steam releases touch games then just throw the steam icon on your desktop and launch it. If you don't have touch games then you wouldn't be playing without a keyboard and mouse.
I'll piggy back on you comment, since mine is very similar. I don't see this as a worthwhile product for more than a year. This is purely speculative but Apple will implement this tech themselves, if it catches on, or they'll release something similar and exclusive to the iPhone (highly doubt the latter). My gut tells me that iPhone 6 will roll out with NFC, and this product will die the second it does.
I don't think price is what keeps people from buying tablets, since a decent one can be had for $200. I think what keeps certain people, and I would say this is a large number, from buying tablets is that they don't see a need for one. Tablets aren't meant to do the same tasks as a desktop/laptop that is why they won't replace them.
I can't play around with code after the lesson is over. As a UX analyst, this bothers me. The interpreter shouldn't just shut down after the lesson is complete.
This article ruined the Olympics for me, at least until they get their act together. I had heard a lot about the points made while the games were going on, but it didn't feel like swallowing the pill I just swallowed.