1,175 karma · joined November 1, 2022
Look at the CURRENT outcomes produced by mathematical geniuses within the financial sector (and military..). My argument isn't that math's impact is solely detrimental. For me it is about balance and diversity (math is only part of it)
When it comes to systems theory itself and its buddies, back in the day, Cybernetics was more of a big tent idea. But then the math nerds took the wheel, thanks to Shannon's playbook. And that may not always represent the superior path. Again, It is about balance/diversity
Anyway, if you are willing to forego the convenience of the standard UI, there's a wealth of alternative guides out there. Some track a ton of services like justwatch.com or tastoid.com. Some might have more titles up their sleeve than others.
If you use Prime Video , the new IMDB advanced search is solid. It's got some really nifty filters [1]
[1] https://www.imdb.com/search/title/?online_availability=US%2F...
I agree, and moreover, the more complex the taxonomy, the more likely you'll find people who disagree with it. So perhaps you're right that a simple tags list is the best "simple" solution, and I'm not saying your list is deficient.
One thing I had in mind is allowing an "AND" operator, like searching for "vintage" AND "eq"
> a) usually a "thing" can only belong to 1 category and b) a category often belong in a hiarchy of categories and can only be 1 place
That's why I love hierarchical tags (where tags can have multiple parents) : You can put a "thing" under more than one category/tag while a tag can belong to more than one parent. However, it's true that this is rarely implemented.
I applaud your initiative and suggest you give more thought to categorization.
Yes.
I would pay for this if I could import:
- Thousands of links. This is when LLM search excels.
- A specific list of hierarchical tags that are used for tagging. Open-ended AI-generated tags are always hit or miss, they don't know WHY I bookmarked a link.
This is historically a very good point. Although I'm not versed in the specifics of legal jargon, it's hard to ignore that the practical enforcement of copyright laws in the U.S. seems to have skewed dangerously close to proprietary rights. Consequently, you've pointed us toward the real question: What would a world where copyright had a different meaning look like?
One must look at the history of copyright (or around the world) to appreciate how convoluted the evolution of its (subtle) meaning has been over the centuries.
FYI Another way MIDI is humanized in DAWs is in the temporal domain (i.e., rhythm/timing). This was popularized by Ableton's Groove Pool [1].
I know this would defeat the purpose of a "simple" tracker, but I believe that we need to support the message that food is "complex" [1].
https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/technology
https://guide.ethical.org.au/guide/browse/guide/?cat=600&sub...
If the outlining experience is good enough (drag/drop, collapse...), I will definitely try Plume for "light/fast" note-taking.
For larger personal databases, I find that I often need to clean them up or enrich them with web APIs. Therefore, I will export the data, manipulate it elsewhere, and then reimport it. This requires the data to be "merged" with the existing records in order to preserve the existing IDs, links, and so on.
Commendable breadth in your vision ! but might I suggest going more... atomic? As someone who leans towards outlining, your "tasks" type caught my attention. Ideally, I wish each block could behave like an object in a similar fashion. While transforming blocks into objects is possible, it somewhat defeats the purpose of an outliner's "bird's eye view."
I also doubt the feasibility of centralizing all your personal knowledge in one app; there's a corollary to this. I consistently find myself in need of a "merge feature." The larger the database becomes, the more crucial this feature is.
As for the so-called 'elite' demographic, I will simply say : "Not for lack of trying". (there is this book : "Stealing Fire" [1]). On ancient methods of improvement, it's crucial to note the difference between (super)wisdom and (super)intelligence. But that's a conversation for another time.
[1] https://www.amazon.com/Stealing-Fire-Maverick-Scientists-Rev...
Increasingly, the distinction between core model training and fine-tuning might become ambiguous (how ?). Considering this, we might witness a trend where custom 'add-ons' for AI models become commoditized. Imagine simply downloading a "New York Times" pack to enhance your unofficial "pirate" language model.
Thanks !
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_occupation_of_the_West...
There are now AI based methods to remove vocals / specific instruments. most free ones are not realtime :
online : https://moises.ai/
My initial reaction was similar. Nonetheless, I'm making an effort to embrace the diversity of what music can mean to different individuals. My only question to them is: are you genuinely moved by the music itself or do you "merely" intellectualize it?
That being said, is this emerging field of Quantum Computer Music solely focused on generating random numbers? I must admit I only glanced through the article, so I wouldn't assert this definitively.
For me, the best is a feature-rich, well-maintained, and well-designed app.
Today I saw Zotero for Android on HN. I always recommend Zotero.
If OSS/local is not an issue, raindrop.io is my best (following my criteria).
- https://notebooklm.google/ (US or VPN): uses the "gemini pro" model.
- poe.com: You need to "create a new bot", disable "Make bot publicly accessible," and then "add a knowledge source." this offers many models, although the best ones require a subscription.
Now imagine a synth that reverse-engineers audio sounds you feed it, adjusting its parameters to match. This would be a game-changer for learning. This recently released FM synth is trying to do just that with AI : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gTYlYG6-R8
- As a first step, we may want to sort tracks by similarity. With Spotify API, each track has attributes that could be used to easily "map" the tracks mutual distances.
- Spotify already has an automix feature that works only on exclusive Spotify playlists [1]. And I think it is automated.
- There are (at least one) mobile apps that do this (not tested) : https://www.mixonset.com/
[1] https://community.spotify.com/t5/FAQs/What-is-Automix/ta-p/5...
The coming standard claims "up to 2GB/s possible." [1], and at this "speed" (of adoption, that is), this is not coming anytime soon.
[1] https://www.pcworld.com/article/2124706/sd-express-9-1-new-s...
Capacities is partially going in this direction. Notion, less so, but it is simple and advanced (linked records...) and hence a favorite of mine too.