3,538 karma · joined May 15, 2010
* * . * .
.. * o
o * . *
________
(________)
| o |
| o o |
| o |
| o o |
| o o |
| o |
( o )
\ o /
\ /
\ /
||
||
||
||
||
___||___
/ || \
\________/Meat production is about 15% of our global carbon emissions, so certainly it can't be ignored - but when the other 85% is coming from activity fueled by petroleum+coal, it doesn't make a lot of sense to throw up your hands to reject a carbon tax because there's "thousands" of emissions source (which ones?) which collectively amount to less than a percentage point of our carbon footprint.
We mustn't let the best be the enemy of the very, very good. A straight-forward carbon tax on fossil fuels is both enforceable, linear, and not that complicated. Can we ignore ranching and meat production? Of course not. So let's tax both.
The good news I guess is that having a clumsy REPL has really gotten me into vim-slime.
It's a small gripe, but one thing that really bothers me is that they gave up on libreadline for the REPL (for what seem like fairly superficial build management issues, looking at the original email threads) in favor of a custom solution, which
* doesn't support vim-like or emacs-like keybindings, and
* won't read my .inputrc file and my customizations
It's just maddening using julia's REPL without this. It's easy to dismiss user complaints like this, but I can go back and forth between bash and into the python REPL and all of my line discipline actually makes sense, but then the julia REPL is broken and clumsy.
Also, pdb.set_trace() is a lot easier and more productive than what Debugging.jl has to offer.
MacOS just kept getting better and better until sometime around Yosemite or El Capitan, with a small hiccup with Lion.
It was a big challenge getting an entire CPU on a single chip back then. Arguably, every single microprocessor from the 4004 to the 386 was just restoring features that the minicomputers originally had.
The original git porcelain commands - git branch, git reset, git pull - are execrable. They’re filled with implementation details (index/cache vs staging), weird and suggestive syntax that seems like it should be extensible and widely applicable but isn’t (localbranch:remotebranch), and nuclear-powered self-destruct functionality hidden amongst playthings (git reset vs git reset —hard).
Probably for the best. Social media is poison.
At some point they can just tell you to upload your contacts and drivers license via email or a web form if you want to use the app, WTF do you plan on doing then?
I'm really trying to help you understand why Google and Apple can't rely on OS-level caps and perms. If you don't understand how app devs can cheat you blind regardless of what system-level perms you set, you're clearly not an app dev. I can ID your device and send it encrypted back to my server. I can find your non-standard address book and read it off the user partition by nicely offering you a utility service like backup. It's gzipped and encrypted and sent back to my db and forget about your privacy. I can do a lot more on your ROM'ed android device than you expect, and I can do it all with permissions and a bit of social engineering.
Now just imagine what I can do with your grandma.
Or, Google and Apple tell me to f*cking cut it out and threaten to toss me out of the App Store.
In order to view your facebook timeline and newsfeed, we need access to your address book. Please allow access.
Allow/Deny"
There's no automated capabilities-based OS-level permissions model that can protect against this. Accessing the address book is a legitimate app request - just not for Facebook Inc. in my opinion. But they can gate access to your timeline and friends by demanding it. And I guarantee you that 9/10 smartphone users will grant it. This is why you need curation and app store rules.
The fact that manufacturing is cheap now and schematics are not only the key to repairability but also counterfeit Chinese knock-offs is a problem worth understanding.
Is that not a direct subsidy? Are they wrong? (genuinely curious - your post is interesting enough that I felt I had to do some research to clarify my own thinking)
https://www.cato.org/commentary/examining-americas-farm-subs...