Congeec

I used a tool called lamonade that let you access the clipboard of Windows via a socket server.

https://github.com/lemonade-command/lemonade

I'm pretty satisfied with the package manager scoop. Scoop for now works best when you just install binary software. It is not a replacement for package managers like vcpkg yet with which you can pull dev dependencies for a project.

How does winget compare to scoop? Does it replace vcpkg/nuget/conan/...?

I use https://github.com/samuelcolvin/pydantic instead

gitlab is already doing this. The default branch name when you click `Create Merge Request` is issue_id-issue_title, like "477-update-readme-md"

Is there any equivalents of perl one-liners?

It's called SARS-Cov-2, not -19

The title is just one of those many points made.

I have been using httpx 0.95 in production. So far so good.

also Monad in Haskell

> No special pleading. No whining. No excuses. > No buts and no exceptions. No "middle ground".

This sounds strong to me. Not to be provocative since I am not familiar with the mailing list, I would like to ask is it common to communicate this way in this Debian community? Is it effective to push things moving forward?

I've been looking at this laptop recently. How do you feel when you use it? Is it heavy or light? How is the temperature when it is fully loaded?

There are cases where pattern defeating sort beats timsort

https://github.com/EmuraDaisuke/SortingAlgorithm.HayateShiki

here[1] is a comprehensive list for those who want to know more about fallacies.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases

Tornado, a python web framework. I doubt it is still popular today. But reading the source code is a pleasure. Its naming conveys clearly; its encapsulation allows extensibility; its documentation teaches me how to write an industry-level library.

https://github.com/tornadoweb/tornado/blob/master/tornado/io...

Thank you. The Language Injections feature amazes a vim user, though similar limited plugin exists.

Sorry I didn't defined the problems clearly and thank your for your help. I am using selenium using python for web automation, not testing. The latter problem was by and large solved by subclassing WebDriverWait by adding common Exceptions related to nodes staleness. The former problem was tackled by writing a for loop detecting changes of the context to know if WebElement.click() fails silently.

The thing is I have to write these workarounds everywhere. What's more, I inject javascript code a lot to avoid nodes staleness caused by network latency. I believe selenium is not designed for writing lots of javascript. And javascript code in a string of python can not be linted, which increases debugging workload.

To this point, the cost of these hacks is too much in my project. I find puppeteer play nicely with javascript after trying. But the difference and reliability between waitFor() in puppeteer and WebDriverWait() in selenium still remain questionable.

I am wondering if using puppeteer can ease pains mentioned above.

How? With selenium I have a case that WebElement.click() fails but it doesn’t throw. Also Select(...).select_by_visible_text() throws WebDriverException, StaleElementException, etc even if you WebDriverWait()’d for it to be available. To me these show selenium is unreliable. How puppeteer is reliable pertaining to these cases?

Any reason you choose to build on the command line interface of lsof rather than reusing its api by diving into its source code?

You need YouCompleteMe. It uses Jedi internally, but the completion is async i.e. the ui is not blocked. Also it caches completions, you shall get completion candidates reasonably fast the second time you input tf.