ClickQuestion

I don't know what business experience you have on your team, but make sure someone with enough of a business mind is the one driving the process on your side.

The technical details are just that - implementation details. Talk about features & benefits. How you do it is not relevant to a corporate development discussion.

There's no reason to allow that kind of detailed conversation to happen, especially not before figuring out what your stuff is worth to THEM.

They are clearly interested, play your cards carefully. There's very little to gain from oversharing, despite how hard they made try to persuade you otherwise.

Share strategicially. If you've already got credibility and traction and prototypes, demonstrating your competence can be "it works".

Thanks - completely different use case than Prosper202. Very cool, I'll add this to my bag of tricks.

How are you defining user? Someone that clicks on a link in a Google search because you have SEO juice? Or is there some kind of deeper relationship you have with these users.

250M is a huge number.

How do you decide which customers are about to churn?

This is incredibly cool. I saw http://rr-project.org/ on here recently.

Am I to understand this is basically the same, except you've added the ability to follow along in source code? That sounds very very cool.

What capabilities do you have if no source is available?

This is the perfect device for an internet of things horror story.

" And then my phone got hacked, and then my Pavlok started shocking me over and over again. When I tried to remove it, it locked on tighter. 'I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid you've asked me not to allow that, Dave' "

Looks interesting. I'm curious why you built this. Prosper202 is the canonical approach used by most affiliates. It's got both self-hosted and hosted options.

From your landing page, I can't tell what missing features led you to roll your own.