[1]https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz/Solutions/design-vi...
414 karma · joined October 13, 2014
[1]https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz/Solutions/design-vi...
Stripped down to the bare essentials, the simplest photovore circuits [2][3] work by setting up a voltage divider between two photoresistors positioned like eyes on either side of the robot's body. The output is fed into an inverter based oscillation circuit biased by the side of the robot light is coming from. This runs through some more inverters in parallel to step up the current high enough for two tiny motors with wheels. It creates a robot that waddles towards the brightest light in the room.
The simplicity of the circuit makes the various emergent robot behaviors that much more surprising and interesting. The frequency of the oscillations get faster in brighter light and slower in dim conditions, almost like the robot is searching harder to find the light in a dark room. If one wheel gets stuck, the torque stalling motor backfeeds into the control circuit and it can sometimes jolt or vibrate itself unstuck. If you power the whole thing with a solarpanel that charges up a capacitor for bursts of runtime, the robot really seems to come alive as it wiggles it's way towards the light imperative that keep it's circuits fed. There is something magical when you see a robot struggling to stay alive.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BEAM_robotics
[2] http://solarbotics.net/library/circuits/pix/4_comp_pvore.gif
[3] http://solarbotics.net/library/circuits/bot_popper_240.html
Sometimes when all your solutions are bad, you just have to pick the least bad solution. It's still not a good solution, but not solving it is worse. If it is the only available device they know of with the chip they need, they might not have another option.
Unless the delibility of ink was a feature they desired. Hypothesizing that they were trying to prevent a working ranger from falling into the wrong hands wouldn't strike me as absurd. Dropping them in a firepit or stream to remove the ink would be pretty handy if you know your military encampment is about to be over-run and you can't save everything.
This was just my n=1 experience and perspective in my particular corner of the world. I would love to hear if other students or faculty from those eras had similar or dissimilar experiences.
"By 3rd or 4th grade, wouldn't you have interacted with a library's card catalog"
In that school's library, they had just replaced the old card catalog with a computer terminal based dewy decimal system a few years before I started. Looking at screenshots today, I'm fairly certain it was Dynix[1]. It was the early nineties, and a pretty big deal they had a computer in the school at all. In those years, the librarian was the only one trained to use the terminal, so you simply told her what you were looking for and she helped you find it. Maybe some of the older kids were taught how to use the computer, but there was serious resistance to letting us sticky handed younger kids touch it. I'm sure I had visited the local public library as well by that age, but again, I probably got assistance from parents or librarians to find things until I got older.
"or say, how your family's cassettes or cds were stored for retrieval?"
My father might have had a few audio cassettes, but VHS tapes were all I really interacted with before grade 5. A few of my family friends had walls of VHS laden bookcases in their living room, but we were not that family. The VHS tapes were bulky, but you could record over old things you had already watched so you didn’t need a lot of them. Our system of organization was more akin to shoving them all in the largest drawer in the living room. If anything, my family’s approach to media storage would have encouraged the “all in one bucket” approach that so many of the students in the article seem to favor.
We are a multidisciplinary architectural design, fabrication, and exhibitions firm working on several large science museum exhibits. We are looking for someone talented willing to push the state-of-the-possible in interactive experiences, moving sculptural elements, and mechanisms with an eye to reliability and manufacturability. You’ll design and prototype components, send parts out for manufacture, and order parts from suppliers. You’ll also work with the rest of our fabrication and design teams to integrate mechanisms with other architectural elements, plan installations, and utilize our unique in-house fabrication technologies. As one of the first engineers at rootlab, you’ll have the chance to take on leadership roles as our team expands.
Useful Experience and Skills for the Role:
● Experience with design tools: CAD / FEA / CAM. Ability to design mechanisms and integrate custom and acquired parts into large assemblies. (Primarily SolidWorks)
● Prototyping and fabrication experience: 3D printing , laser cutting, welding, turning, milling, CNC machining.
● Mechatronics experience: using sensors, circuitry, controlling actuators, specifying and sourcing actuators.
● Experience with design for manufacture: machining, weldments, sheet metal forming, mold making.
Bonus Skills:
● Sourcing Guru: What is available and where to get it (and what to do when McMaster-Carr doesn't carry it)
● Museum exhibit experience: ADA compliant design, child accessible design
● Testing and troubleshooting experience
● Robotics experience
If some or all of this sounds like a good fit, please send your resume and any examples you can share of your past work to hiring (at) rootlab.com
[1] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/02/ars-w...
An interesting side note is that you could 'hear' a very high pitched sound when using the device even though 50kHz is far outside the standard human hearing range. We still are not sure but think we were hearing a lower harmonic of the tone bouncing around the skull.
This is an apple to oranges comparison. I work with a Lulzbot 5, a Lulzbot Mini, a Stratasys dimension elite, and two polyprinters on a daily basis and have been working with 3D printers for over 10 years as part of my job. Why was a material like HIPS ever used for comparison with ABS if both machines can print with ABS? Why was the extrusion width 0.6mm on a 0.5mm nozzle? Why is he comparing a 100% fill print with a 25% fill print? Why didn't he mention that the Lulzbot Taz 5 he was using has a $500 print head upgrade to let it print soluble support material as well? This whole article just reeks of either someone who is either very new and inexperienced to Hobby 3D printers or was intentionally trying to make the TAZ 5 look bad. I have done similar comparison studies myself and have come to drastically different conclusions. We sold the dimension elite a while ago.