12 karma · joined June 22, 2011
Prior ... constitutes all information that has been made available to the public in any form before a given date that might be relevant to a patent's claims of originality
OK, so you're saying the links above don't have any bearing on the originality or otherwise of iOs multi touch? That's absurd. If what you're getting at is that there's some legalese-technical argument as to why a seemingly obvious prior occurrence of the "invention" then this indicates to me that the system is broken.
http://wearables.unisa.edu.au/projects/mpx/
http://gizmodo.com/278613/linux-mpx-multi+touch-table-may-be...
fwiw
From a purely selfish point of view (European software developer) I say bring it on, saddling U.S. software companies with these ridiculous rules should eventually make my life easier competing against them. I'll quite happily infringe these "patents" and sell my good outside the U.S.
BTW, why is it Google's responsibility to "spend billions dismantling the patent system"?