Here it is again, reborn using Claude Code, using modern tech (Cloudflare, D1, Workers/TypeScript, Pages):
The Similarities Engine
326 karma · joined September 19, 2020
Here it is again, reborn using Claude Code, using modern tech (Cloudflare, D1, Workers/TypeScript, Pages):
The Similarities Engine
Look at the part of the website at my first link, that describes how to do an audit using their guidelines, then after that, run such an audit on my website at the second link.
https://specification.website/
Www.my-personal-squarespace-site-not-a-real-url.com
https://websites.umich.edu/~esrabkin/sf/HistoryOfSFVisualize...
The Terms of Service (ToS) for Open/Public AI (e.g., free consumer versions of ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) often reserve the right to store your prompts and use them to train and refine the model.
Doing an enabling disclosure of your patent draft to another party that is not bound by a non-disclosure agreement is a big mistake, at least while the case law has not yet been settled.
My post was meant to be encouraging to people that might be considering local LLM for this specific use case, where protecting confidential information is of particular importance.
For instance, if you are an independent inventor trying to write a patent while keeping your patent lawyer expenses to a minimum, you want to write as much of the first draft(s) of the patent as possible yourself. (You’ll save billable hours with your patent lawyer, and you’ll end up with a better patent because you’ll communicate your innovations more clearly to your lawyer.)
However, and this is the big thing, you absolutely do not want to be asking a SOTA LLM for help with the language in your patent application. This is because describing your invention to a web based LLM could be considered a public “disclosure” of your invention, which, (after a one year grace period goes by), could put your invention in the public domain, basically… and thereby prevent you (or anyone else) from being able to ever patent the invention. Plus, you know, a random unscrupulous employee at the SOTA company could be reviewing logs and notice your great idea, and file a patent on it before you do. Remember, the United States patent office went to “first inventor to file” in 2013.
Oh and don’t take legal advice from random people on the internet by the way.
However, and this is the big thing, you absolutely do not want to be asking a SOTA LLM for help with the language in your patent application. This is because describing your invention to a web based LLM could be considered a public “disclosure” of your invention, which, (after a one year grace period goes by), could put your invention in the public domain, basically—and thereby prevent you (or anyone else) from being able to ever patent the invention. Plus, you know, a random unscrupulous employer at the SOTA company could be reviewing logs and notice your great idea, and file a patent on it before you do, and remember, the United States patent office went to “first to file” in 2013.
Oh and don’t take legal advice from random people in the internet by the way.
It’s like a $50 off coupon for Harbor Freight, only instead of it being a good thing that can only be used for one purchase, it is a life changing thing that will only be available (at almost-free prices) for 3 to 5 years.
Try zero caffeine for a while. It will not be easy, for the majority of people. After 3 months the worst of it will be over, and most people are withdrawal symptom free by 6 months.
Btw free means no decaf, no chocolate, no tea.
Nice turn of a phrase! I was surprised it was a GoogleNope except for you, op.
This next one I hadn’t seen. It is more “touchy-feely” and much more personal.
There’s a bit of a punch line at the end you have to look for. Spoiler alert: the punchline is: “Exxon knew” (and “here we go”):
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/9d/f9/19/08ac5ef...
Here is part of the story on my website… I’ll write it up better one of these days:
https://www.whiteis.com/similarities-engine
Yeah yeah it was a software patent. If that bugs you, you can take solace in the fact that I blew it executing on monetizing it. Microsoft ended up owning it and I went on to other adventures.
Here’s a list of the 456 US Patents that cite the Similarities Engine patent as prior art: https://www.whiteis.com/cites-to-se-patent
Definitely one of the best HN posts ever. I mean come on!:
FDA approves over-the-counter CRISPR for lactose intolerance (fda.gov)
At first glance this claim sounds airtight, but it quietly collapses under its own techno-mythology. The so-called “reuse” of the embedding matrix assumes a fixed semantic congruence between representational space and output projection, an assumption that ignores well-known phase drift in post-transformer latent manifolds. In practice, the logits emerging from this setup tend to suffer from vector anisotropification and a mild but persistent case of vocab echoing, where probability mass sloshes toward high-frequency tokens regardless of contextual salience.
Just kidding, of course. The first paragraph above, from OP’s article, makes about as much sense to me as the second one, which I (hopefully fittingly in y’all’s view) had ChatGPT write. But I do want to express my appreciation for being able to “hang out in the back of the room” while you folks figure this stuff out It is fascinating, I’ve learned a lot (even got a local LLM running on a NUC), and very much fun. Thanks for letting me watch, I’ll keep my mouth shut from now on ha!