I have gone so far as to FTP files to myself to edit on a more familiar editor, then FTP'd them back to the target machine rather than use vi, so it's high time I internalized the basics.
266 karma · joined March 17, 2011
I have gone so far as to FTP files to myself to edit on a more familiar editor, then FTP'd them back to the target machine rather than use vi, so it's high time I internalized the basics.
I excluded a list of people from seeing posts I made and posts other people put on my wall.
When I used the "View my profile as," I wouldn't see the excluded elements.
Once the new design launch, I realized that all these settings were lost - I can do "View my profile as" one of the people on my excluded list, and see the stuff I didn't want shown.
I've always thought the complaints people make after each redesign were simply resistance to change, but this time it doesn't seem worth it to continue.
Like Gabriel says, that doesn't mean I'm not passionate, but others may interpret it as such, or think that I don't care at all about anything.
When something happens and I feel like there's a risk of someone misinterpreting my lack of visible reaction as something it isn't... I give a visible reaction.
That is, if something legitimately good and exciting happens, and I'm the only one in the room not celebrating, I'll force a smile/laugh/shout if there's someone present who doesn't know me well enough to understand my stoicism.
I don't feel like a fraud or phony for doing this; doing it is like accommodating a guest. If I raise my voice when talking to someone who has hearing loss, I'm not faker, even though I don't normally talk that way. If I use simple English to talk to someone who primarily speaks Spanish, I'm not being duplicitous.
It's not a disavowal of my personality or "wiring" to do this; it's a recognition that not everyone is so familiar with me to understand my particular emotional set point.
I was reading (http://blog.vrplumber.com/index.php?/archives/2526-Python-2....) today and thinking, "This wouldn't have been much of a problem on Windows."
For example, I've worked for two ISPs in which engineers are responsible for larger networks than the IT department is, yet the engineers are still not allowed to, say, install a new version of Java on their own machines.
Then again, I'm not scooping up bargain HP shares, so my idle speculation isn't extremely compelling even to me.
Also, having learned Python 3 first, I can't stand porting things to Python 2. It's like taking a final draft of an idea and trying to turn it into a rough draft.
Some highlights: "Ms. Klein's rhetoric is ridiculous. For instance, she attaches import to the fact that the word 'tank' appears in the label 'think tank.'"
"What the reader will find is a series of fabricated claims, such as the suggestion that Margaret Thatcher created the Falkland Islands crisis to crush the unions."
"If nothing else, Ms. Klein's book provides an interesting litmus test as to who is willing to condemn its shoddy reasoning."
It's not very confusing exiting the highway and turning left - just follow the lights.
It is kind of confusing exiting the highway and turning right. Right-on-red is allowed, and to make such a maneuver you have to look in strange places for traffic that might hit you. I've almost messed it up a few times. The other option is to let people honk at you while you wait for a green.
I'm curious as to what will happen when the power to the lights fails.
Seems like Seth isn't thinking very creatively about this. How about letting marketers say whatever they want, but the FDA publishes a pamphlet that is posted in the store aisle that ranks brands according to the latest research on effectiveness?
I don't necessarily endorse this solution, but Seth's "only way" seems to me to be... not the only way.
This is a fairly difficult integral, since it requires the trick of multiplying by 1 in a clever way. http://math2.org/math/integrals/more/sec.htm
Not saying it's an accurate summary, but I don't think you were actually very curious!
My guess is that E. O. Wilson is probably right about ants, David Sloan Wilson is probably not right about group selection being like Daniel Dennett's universal acid, and Steven J. Gould was probably wrong in most of what he promoted.
However, I have worked in capacity planning at a mobile telecom, and it's scary how confused that alleged experts are about "bytes" and "bytes per second."
Given that experience, I'm not surprised that AT&T would get "bytes transferred" wrong, but I think it's more likely due to incompetence and not malice. I wouldn't be surprised if they underbilled people also.
Unity is not bad by any stretch, but it feels unfinished to me when I use it. I kept hitting the wrong thing and breaking the flow of whatever task I was doing. I'm sure with some more experience with it I'll quit doing that, but it kept violating my expectations and stealing my attention from more important things.
Gnome 3 was a big change, but felt much tighter and polished. I didn't seem to have to think too much about how to do stuff.
Based on that experience, I think I'd like to use Gnome 3 on Ubuntu long-term.
"VisiCalc" was the first one on a PC, "Lotus 1-2-3" became popular later, "Excel" is now the dominant one...