Microsoft has an initiative called AI4Sciencie (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/lab/microsoft-resea...) which published a fair amount of SDE/diffusion-based method to solve scientific problems
200 karma · joined May 13, 2019
Microsoft has an initiative called AI4Sciencie (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/lab/microsoft-resea...) which published a fair amount of SDE/diffusion-based method to solve scientific problems
Similarly, humans are also prone to the distribution shift unless we get updated information on a specific topic. The key differences are that we are great at continual learning and we are much better at learning abstraction
I can see some niche applications for this system, but I am very skeptical it's ability to handle larger models (100M+) and the ability to and it's scalability when there are increased demand.
Additionally, while we don't know how us humans functionally reason, it's believed that the predictive nature of our brain is central to our reasoning abilities. Maybe in some way, the autoregressive nature of LLMs is similar to our predictive brain.
For a collection of emergent properties in LLMs, I recommend this paper [2]
[1]https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903.pdf [2]https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.07682.pdf
Has anyone tried having two apple watches so one can be worn while the other charges?
[edit] Charging it at night is kind of missing the point, as I would like to track both my daily activities and my sleep
1. Nobody would store all their wealth in a deflationary currency - other forms of assets, stocks etc will still exist. They will need a high liquidity vehicle to trade a.k.a inflationary currency.
2. Deflationary currency doesn't necessarily mean it will gain value overtime. Unless it contains growing intrinsic value, the overall market cap will drop/plateau.
Think of inflation vs deflation as lubricant vs sandpaper, one encourages economic activities while the other discourages.
IMO the biggest problem with most cryptocurrencies is their deflationary nature. Limited supply means they behave more like assets than currency. As currency nobody would want to spend it as they gain value over time. As an asset it lacks intrinsic value, and therefore overall market cap will tank slowly.
https://www.guancha.cn/politics/2020_01_01_530191.shtml?s=zw...
https://www.guancha.cn/politics/2020_01_01_530191.shtml?s=zw...
I was born in Wuhan and half of my family are currently holed up there. A few days before the Wuhan lockdown was ordered, coronavirus already made it to the headline in CNN and NYT, but there was not any headline news about the coronavirus within China. Heck my dad wasn't even wearing a mask on his 1hr metro commute to work until the day before lockdown happened.
In early January, government officials and news outlets were reporting: "There are false rumors about Wuhan having a SARS like virus. This is an unknown virus that's _probably not_ transmittable from human to human. There are only 45 confirmed cases. There is no need to panic. "
One of the officials even organized a thousand people CNY dinner as part of the CNY celebration a few days before the lockdown.
They had a thousand opportunities to curb the disease and alert the people, but the Chinese bureaucracy and leadership's imcompetence directly caused the coronavirus disaster.
Edit: January 21 news article on the thousand people dinner from a Chinese source. About 40k people participated, this neighbourhood is about 10 minutes away from the epicenter: https://news.163.com/20/0121/15/F3E3UTKI0001899N.html