Banditoz

The assumption being made is VSCode is not running on the prod machine.

Who are you referring to? This reads like projection.

GitHub shows 44 contributors. 41 distinct users have merged pull requests.

...so now their work has been reduced to nothing?

Is engaging with the site just reading its content, not liking or retweeting? Sometimes I just want to read a tweet thread that was sent to me without ditractions in a straightforward UI.

You're building a weak strawman here. The author didn't call you nor your son out specifically.

How do these repos always have so many stars and forks? Roughly 1,800 forks, but only 40ish unique authors? Almost 30,000 stars? Something fishy is going on...

Don't they just use Macs at Microsoft?

Oh dear, why does this website override scrolling behavior?

Are your taxes complicated such that you feel the need to have an LLM do them for you?

I await your repo tomorrow, then! I'd be happy to use an alternative with all backfilled playercount data and sales history that hasn't been sold out.

Eh, once it's set up the maintenance cost is minimal. Cron'd backups and such and you won't have to worry.

It's crazy these things don't have much interopability with third parties.

Is it so difficult to expose a MQTT thing or some other random HTTP server, default off but configurable in some developer settings, that could be used to control the device/read state? It would certainly make the minority that is us power users happy.

Not the same thing.

Recently the physical cards are sold at a machine inside Haneda airport.

I disagree. Nitter's big pull was lightweight SSR, this site is not that. Nitter also actually _looks like_ Twitter more than this site!

What makes you say that?

A lot of instances are showing rate limited too.

I think you're conflating two different things here. I am not aware of any DB optimization articles that say "trust me bro, throw your data, don't build indices, it'll Just Work™!"

Just because a Github issue doesn't have activity doesn't mean it's not an issue anymore.

Moore's Law covers transistors, not LLMs.

I don't know, why are you? Who's to say Anthropic wasn't already modifying output in some way for optimization or some other reason? These models are incredibly opaque.

Doesn't mean Twitter should've followed suit.

How does that help anything?

Is something you disagree with a "Reddit-tier take"?

Seems to be more level skepticism to me. Not "blind hate".

I wish I knew. The article is difficult to read due to the heavy use of LLM prose.

The page uses 10% of my CPU while doing nothing on it.

You are welcome to continue to read these LLM-generated writings without questioning their content.

What's the current OLED recommendation today?

What is git not suited for in modern development? I haven't found any reasons.