AnonDataSci

You're quite literally posting in a thread about Twitter deplatforming people. I don't understand how you can argue about people leaving Twitter for other platforms "just because."

Somehow I doubt that these people will be satisfied with a "separate but equal" policy.

You're equating fringe groups with a mainstream political movement. Those kinds of caricatures are only possible because half of US voters have been totally deplatformed and are unable to speak for themselves. I am very worried that is a recipe for violence.

You can't deny half of the electorate a platform to speak out and expect none of them to get angry.

Posting this under a throwaway for obvious reasons.

I volunteered to do some analysis on the election data because I'm more interested in finding the truth than being partisan. During the counting process, the relative advantage of a ballot reporting batch toward Biden has strong correlation to certain external regressors that are meta to the counting process itself. These correlations absolutely should not be there, and yet they occur in swing states with p-values in excess of 10^-40. I can't say which external regressors, because this is part of an active legal battle, but suffice it to say, something strange is afoot. It's better to perform an audit and prove no fraud than to be ideological about the impossibility of fraud.