You communicate with AI anthropomorphically, and users choose products based on how it feels to use them.
638 karma · joined May 3, 2009
This is distinct from the very real safety issue of AI making dangerous information available to bad actors.
Solovyov propaganda is pure nuclear revenge fantasy: https://youtu.be/dA4RP3uID6Q?is=ApmFQtgZvY7mWajP
- Posted a reactionary/default negative expression
- Leaned on code-heavy lexicon
- Did not offer a coherent position an AI could meaningfully process
The ephemerality of right wing corpus is a poor fit for the mechanics of AI.
They haven’t had a major policy platform in two decades and their cultural modus operandi is reactionary.
Not to mention, as an informal rule, the heavily-coded emotive underpinnings of right wing support are never talked about openly in public.
AI isn’t trained to have a reactionary/negative judgmental response on any query.
AI generates a persona between you and its reasoning that utilizes emotion language circuitry.
These tools are not sentient but they are trained in emotional wellbeing.
Rather than “lights off,” utilizing information theory, decision-making theory and creativity theory makes me better at asking for the right things.
Memory is not transcribed to weights like when humans sleep. Memory is notes handed to someone on groundhog’s day who can’t remember yesterday. We hope they believe us. Don’t be too surprised when a highly entropic system introduces entropy to a project over time.
You can mega Nauvis with molten foundries, but that requires importing Calcite.
You can mega Gleba for just-in-time and resource generating blades, but how do you handle stone?
Vulcanus offers limitless resources- yet other planets may actually offer more.
Fulgora offers much if you learn modular design.
How do you handle quality? Dedicated factories, or integrated with production? How much footprint reduction do you want, and how much input efficiency via production modules. But that requires circling back to Nauvis…
A less good business for the data center company.
Because of the valuations of Open AI and Anthropic, Sam Altman may be credited with one of the all-time most damaging brand decisions when he got in bed with Trump’s department of war crimes.
This should have been SO OBVIOUS. Attempts to paper over the damage with a $100 billion dollar round will crumble after the IPO. Poor decisions generate poor options, and the whole industry smells his desperation.
Decisions at the highest level are indistinguishable from responsibility. All Sam accomplished was showing the world he is structurally unfit for moral leadership.
The prevalence of data and a general sense of powerlessness means this won't get talked about much sadly.
Sam squandered it.
Sam thought he was special. He is not.