And the population is aging fast.
543 karma · joined March 24, 2019
And the population is aging fast.
Providers love to boast about max speeds, but the reality is every device under a base station shares the total capacity, more devices means competition and slower speeds.
Just like this kind of glorious China stories play right into China's palate.
You can call it soft war.
Xi: "Overseas students are United Front work's new foothold." http://www.zytzb.gov.cn/tzb2010/wxwb/201604/d53a3ab80f1149f7...
Xi's brainchild.
"millennium strategy".
And new title for Shenzhen, "Frontier Demonstration Area of Socialism".
I'm not saying it's rare to eat pork, what I’m saying is eating pork almost everyday like it's a super normal thing, not just every now and then or even ocassionally. I don't doubt there were many people who can afford to tho it's 1.4 billion afterall.
In my mid-sized town eating pork was a treat back then, especially when there were guests or holidays, definitely not everyday, it was soy products, fish (near a big reservoir) and eggs, people's wages were 50 to 100 dollars, farmers were even poorer coz it was all susbsistence farming.
_
There's no reply button.
http://finance.sina.com.cn/x/20040908/07101007244.shtml
Do the math, pork was fluctuating around 1 dollar per 500g back then.
Yunnan is mountainous so it probably doesn't even qualify as susbsistence farming, but it's warm and has fruit industry and tourism now, you can still find extreme poverty in Guizhou's mountains which is right above Yunnan.
Leiyang is not a town in the American sense, it was a county now a city. Village → town → county → city → capital → province.
So I don't really know if you are fk superior.
Every animal protein source will be driven to raise prices coz it's not like China could produce vastly more but refrained, arable land is not enough, it imports 30% of it's food, they just can't produce the cheap feed crops needed not to mention the amount.
It is only in the recent 15 years that the average people could afford to put meat in their daily dishes (and aboslutely not in the sense as Ameicans eat cheap meat as a staple), that's why Chinese dishes are so heavy in carbs and veggies and soy. To take that away from many is the difference of have and have not.
China 54,070,000 America 9,452,000 Brazil 2,811,000
It's estimated that the supply gap will be 20,000,000 tons in 2020, I don't think Brazil can supply that even if they ditch pork.
The whole planet can't supply it.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/237619/export-of-pork-in...
Xi used the word "struggle (斗争)" 58 times in his speech yesterday at the Central Party School.
http://xinhuanet.com/politics/2019-09/03/c_1124956081.htm
-
Another important thing is the collapse of Chinese pork industry due to African swine fever, unlike other monoculture diseases such as mad cow and banana Panama disease, it has no cure and prevention, it's doomed in the foreseeable future.
It hit China particularly hard because pork is their cheapest(by a large margin) and main red meat, compounding it is that China can't deign to import cheap NA feed crops and pork coz America is the enemy now, price is now around 3 dollars per 500g, pricier than imported Australian beef (Chinese beef is usually twice the price of pork), and is expected to hike even more during holiday season and Chinese new year, maintain a high level after that.
Chinese people don't care about politics, but pork prices will push basically everything more expensive and force them to care, and that's dangerous for the party.
I don't know if there are government sponsored campaigns, but the vast majority of these people are acting spontaneously, you can see people on Weibo sharing how to register western social media and what to do if suspended, there are Baidu Tiebas(similar to Google+) dedicated to these coordinated campaigns with millions of followers.
The reality is the vast majority of China support the CCP, and most of them do not hate the regime.
The WSJ Chinese weibo account was banned last month, even though it basically only posts good news about China and bad news about America.
Also:
>The Chinese central government rejected Lam’s proposal to withdraw the extradition bill and ordered her not to yield to any of the protesters’ other demands at that time,
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-protests-china-e...
Yes, there will always be outliers, but in the case of China, where conformity is of utmost importance, they really are just absolute minorities in the 1.4B population.
If you've been following the developments of HK protests, a key indicator is that almost all of these "passive dissents" of the CCP you described turned against HKers just like average Chinese, they are bashing HKers and lapping up the info the party gave them.
Do these people love freedom or even democracy, yes, but they are also acting against it in the case of HK. This is the paradox, they love the "good aspects" of freedom and democracy but they also vehemently hate and reject the "bad ones" that inevitably come with it.
And the state media has been touting for years that China is the safest country on earth that "you can buy skewers at midnight", that America is the example of a failed society.
They mostly likely are sincerely and proudly presenting this as a superiority over the tumultuous west.
That how you know it's nothing but a marketing campaign to boost their stock price.