259 karma · joined January 2, 2019
Yeah, I can't see why someone _would_ do it if they _could_ but aren't being paid well. The problem is motivating people with the skills to want to work... and it's hard to do that at borderline poverty entry-level wages.
If anything, hiring inept people will make the qualified folks want to stick around less. This has the opportunity to be bad-upon-bad! Yay!
Then again, research suggests that homeschooling doesn't have an adverse socialization impact [1]...
[1] https://responsiblehomeschooling.org/research/summaries/home...
[1] https://taxfoundation.org/historical-income-tax-rates-bracke...
My comment about rejecting authority was more about my relationship with my teacher, not internal relationships within the book. Perhaps the paradox was my teacher then, no? Personally, I don't believe in Rand's philosophy. I think Roark is an unbelieveable archetype. If my teacher idolizes Rand and says she agrees with the philosophy, it's _her_ paradox for telling me "no, that's wrong" if I, for example, say that I agree that Roark is Rand's ideal man, but that I believe Gail Wynand is the antithesis of Rand's ideal man because he _has the power_ (and money) to reject the status quo but still refuses to do so (whereas Keating, whom most of the class and the teacher selected as the antithesis, is just a social climber and is working for that power).
Edit: I think this [1] is what I was thinking about.
[1] https://gizmodo.com/google-removes-nearly-all-mentions-of-do...