689 karma · joined January 20, 2014
Not as transparent since the mobile apps are closed source at the moment.
It's possible doesn't mean it's viable.
Personally I would wait for more evidence to judge (which seems unlikely to happen). It's not so hard to operate a false flag on platforms like Twitter.
SCMP's piece also mentioned that "It also obtained the required credentials to conduct research on the coronavirus on January 24." That indicates the Centre actually gained more access.
And if you search Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre on Google, you can see it's still actively doing COVID-19 related research. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullar...
IIRC Chrome used to use https://www.google.com/_/chrome/newtab as its ntp.
Apparently there are needs, that's why this guide even exists. Maybe not many but there are people willing to pay for better privacy/data protection.
But you are right, this won't generates continuous income, which is bummer for developers.
Source please?
... [Another Company A supervisor] was asking if there is anything I have with me associated with company IP. I have a memory disk that contains lab data that I plan to write report on, and papers/reports I plan to read at home. Now that I have been exited from (COMP ANY A), can you check what is the best way of handling the information and how sensitive they are? Can I still read the papers/reports from the memory disk?
> 16. After receiving the above text from Tan, Tan's supervisor asked him to return the flash drive (which Tan's text message referred to as a "memory disk") to Company A.> 17. At approximately 5:15 pm on 12/12/18, Tan returned to the Research Technology Center at Company A where he provided a USB flash drive to his supervisor. The USB flash drive was Tan's personal property, which he was not authorized to utilize within Company A's space. There is no record of Company A having issued a USB flash drive to Tan.
How good is the idea while you could be caught with physical evidence?
Account with huge number of followers that can block counter accounts could create an echo chamber, which is rather poisonous to a healthy debate.
That being said, I don't think twitter should be used as an debate platform, and there are some online tools trying to solve the problem already, like Kialo. They perhaps are not good enough, but still better than twitter.
> The security expert, Yossi Appleboum, provided documents, analysis and other evidence
> ... said Appleboum, who accompanied them for a visual inspection of the machine.
So can we at least get some photos of tampered hardware from these "evidence"?Technically possible doesn't mean it happened. You could be punched by your wife, does that mean she did punch you? Sorry for the inappropriate analogy, but you get the idea.
> suspected
> to prevent
Considering the article is credible, it doesn't mean Apple has found anything, it only means they were being cautious, Google is working with Chinese censors.
Could you show me the source to verify this statement? I'm aware of Google's Dragonfly, but I don't think that's equal to working with censors. data:text/html,<h3 contenteditable oninput="document.title=this.innerHTML">untitled</h3><div contenteditable>note</div>
Put this in your address bar or bookmark it. Same functionality as yours, but you can save note's content with Ctrl + S since it's a div tag instead of textarea.You are right, it's not working.
Edit: OK, I know what's going on now, you need to add this to the code above:
.comtr table {
height: 100%;
} .ind img {
height: 100%;
border-right: 3px solid red;
}
If you want different color for different level of indent, just use attribute selector, like: .ind img {
height: 100%;
border-right: 3px solid;
}
img[width="40"] {
border-color: red;
}
img[width="80"] {
border-color: blue;
} There was once a case to be made that it would be better overall for the Chinese populace to have improved access to most information, even if that meant accepting censorship over some information. But given the country's growing authoritarianism, that argument gets harder and harder to make
I don't quite understand such argument.Besides, the Chinese government might not want Google to get back neither. I wonder if the author is going to change his mind once he realizes this. hehe
If you refuse to serve Chinese people, that's another level of the story.
If you think serving people in China is somehow helping the government, you are somehow admitting the legitimacy of the government.
Is it ethical that doing business in Five Eye countries?
Is providing tools/services to the people considered unethical comparing to providing none?
What about free services that everyone including the Chinese can access via Internet? Are they unethical because they didn't block the Chinese?
Thoughts?