31 karma · joined March 28, 2017
I interpret this to mean that there is another record missing, as well: whatever the origin was set to.
If their system is old enough perhaps they have a version of the ISRG X1 certificate that is cross-signed by the expired DST X3 certificate. Some ssl imlementations did poorly with this. https://letsencrypt.org/docs/dst-root-ca-x3-expiration-septe...
Both emails were handled by Sendgrid, passing spf, dkim, and dmarc. They appear to use the same dkim selector, though I suppose that isn't so important--just that the headers were convincing enough.
If FPGAs can implement these changes efficiently—more efficiently than cpu miners—-and be re-synthesized to implement further changes, doesn’t that advantage them?
Case in point: after their discussion of the bechdel test, I was able to explore follow on questions of my own:
https://28mm.github.io/notes/bechdel-test
Without their data, I probably wouldn’t have bothered, or thought much about it.
If memory serves, the reason it doesn’t first split the description on white space is that some categories contain whitespace, and would never match.
Thanks!
I wonder if a diverging color scheme might make the ratios easier to read, at a glance. E.g. a red scale for ratios > 1, and a blue scale for ratios < 1.
The author argues bs is endemic to "quick-flip startups," but then clarifies that many of these startups are actually good-- not bs.
but no startups in either category are named, and the distinction is unclear in the abstract.
Anyway, I don't get it.
The article concerns the slander that these projects aren't hers; that she is merely a mascot presenting the work of her (male, engineer) boyfriend.
To notice "a mind at work" in the videos, is to suggest that the videos are her authentic work.
But I think it makes sense to see Michael as a victim of circumstance, to a certain extent. We can do something about those circumstances.
Michael (the subject of the article) has only limited access to books, while in prison. education is shown to reduce recidivism, but Michael is limited to courses that don't require hardcover books. (Not many courses, in my experience.)
Few employers will seriously consider felons for jobs, and it is hard not to see this as a contributing factor to his recidivism and death.
I don't think the system worked here, very well, at all.
Not a lot separates the experiences of the two cousins, at least at first. By the time of his cousins' conviction and release, there is a much wider gulf.
So the tone is tragic-- that seems justified. Isn't this a tragedy?