3,211 karma · joined June 25, 2010
Just joking... thanks for that write-up. I'd rather keep the Internet away from Radio (it's too centralized). I much prefer station to station communication over the air rather than packets over some government/corporate controlled network.
If young, interested kids can do it, I'd hope that a nation state could figure it out.
Link: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a5/ComputesGazett...
And making people feel that simply asking questions about Tor will put them in the same category as hardcore criminals is just wrong. We're not all heartless criminals. In fact, most just want a bit of privacy.
It seems odd to me that questions like this on a technology site could somehow be used to incriminate people. Maybe the goal is to prevent people from asking questions.
What you ask can and will be used against you?
When you're researching a large nation with more than a billion people, you'll find a lot of people who have degrees and a lot of people who do not and a lot of people who like chewing gum and (again) a lot of people who do not.
The only thing the results should tell you is that there are a lot of people there. They say nothing about the average individual.
Make it a hobby. The stuff you care about at least. Apply things you discover there in your professional life and you'll stand-out and be noticed.
Most programmers don't love the job. They don't go home and think about how something can be made more efficient or scale better or fit into smaller spaces. Hell, most don't know the meaning of time and space and why those things matter. Those who do (so much so that they make a hobby out of it) are the kinds of people you want working for/with you.
Hang in there. It's not all bad.
- Bjarne Stroustrup
str[::-1]
While it is in C++: std::reverse(str.begin(), str.end());
And Ruby is even more obvious and consistent: str.reverse()
Most people who rag on C++ have never seriously used it. It's not that bad. Really, it isn't.That's just returning True or False (bool). Lot's of people return that from functions in all languages.
cat file | grep string
It's a gratuitous use of cat, it's not useless.gratuitous - uncalled for; lacking good reason; unwarranted
grep string file
Is all you need."Over 25 million people in the US have diabetes, and close to 80 million are pre-diabetic." - From American Diabetes Association
IMO, this problem is way larger than the former cigarette health problem as more people consume sugary drinks and foods than smoked cigarettes.
You don't have to be a mathematician to attack AES-256, you just need to know humans and do some password analysis.
I predict that in the next 5 to 10 years, many organizations across all industry sectors will drop/reject encrypted packets (SSL, SSH, SFTP, etc) that they cannot decrypt. And the reason they'll give is that it makes them more secure.
The concern I have (as a security technologist) is that most people who use encryption are not bad, however everyone is punished and every packet must now be inspected because a few people use encryption to do bad things. So one day soon, I'm afraid that anyone who uses encryption will be suspect simply because they do and the stronger the encryption, then the more suspect they'll be.
Will it become illegal to do encryption research or use OpenPGP unless you agree to escrow your private key or will everyone be forced to use very weak ciphers? In today's climate (encryption is evil), I see all of these things as very real possibilities.
I'm only joking, but the same argument is used against other technologies that governments seek to control/dominate.
Edit: Skipjack was 80-bits I think. It was used in Clipper Phones: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skipjack_(cipher)