150

Fully agree that the ease of use combined with a lack of alternatives makes a compelling argument pro CF.

And I'm afraid I cannot think of a better solution than at least hope for a forseeable competition will lead to the big sites being spread among several reverse-proxying-companies - instead of them all being served by CF. So far, they seem to be doing great work and consequently outperform everyone else.

Does one need to offer an alternative for voicing a concern?

I'm sure they are doing a lot of great work. However, I really do not like the idea of having one company to serve all major websites of the internet. Should one not focus on a better solution to ddos-attacks than putting everything into the hands of a single entity..?