113

I've definitely known places to find ways to get rid of staff before 2 years are up but they tend to be hospitality jobs.

Did you respond to the wrong comment?

> Once you can do generative movies, you can do games

No you can't, these are completely different mediums.

On forums like this people have a frustrating inability to answer the question asked.

I don't know who your friend is but you haven't addressed any of the points made in the posts you're replying to.

Are you talking about medical transition? Why'd you have to use scary euphemisms to refer to something?

> Are there still adults stupid enough to think that watching porn will mess a kid up?

Not only this but there seems to be no one on mainstream platforms putting forward the argument that what will mess kids up is a lack of access to sex education, which the bill also restricts.

> Have you talked to a teacher? Think things like

This is just an anecdote with no way to verify it or the cause.

Do you know if it uses AI to generate any of the titles?

That doesn't stop it being a failure of the healthcare system.

It's a good app, I was happy to subscribe once I used it a couple of times to find new routes about the city.

> legitimate military targets during a time of war

Israel and Lebanon are not at war.

You'd be surprised how cheap politicians are.

It looks like all the time spent designing the car went into quirky extras and not the core features.

That is absolutely not how GPT works.

Get your orders in early.

Oh no, is this esoteric knowledge now?

>Those tall buildings? They provide great shade no matter how sunny it is which is critical for walking to bus stops and subway stations.

Did you just make this whole post up? This is obviously wrong.

This uses a lot of concepts like "common sense" and "understanding" that I'm not sure are useful when talking about language models.

Not now you've posted it on the internet.

That would be significantly less funny and interesting.

I think it's similar to the apocalypse. Society will never entirely break down because there'd be no one left. It will just become a different society with new rules that we struggle to understand just now.

Surely if it's the case that rent will always absorb any increase in wealth then that is a housing problem, not a wage problem.

But no one involved in creating universal credit did so for any other reason than as an excuse to cut the number of people who are eligible.

Sounds like the business should be paying their employees enough to feed their families.

> Do you have data / a citation to back up that statement?

It's at the end of their comment.

That's what they mean, using it.

I would be fine with paying for good quality journalism, none of it is though.

It's because people are poor, trying to get more money out of people that are already poor isn't going to work either.

Have to agree, he sounds a lot like those "infinite energy" guys that were around a few years ago.