HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

0wing

410 karma · joined December 19, 2017

submissionscomments
0wing··on As Bitcoin Bubble Loses Air, Frauds and Flaws Rise to Surface
Sounds like a bank or venmo type service...
0wing··on As Bitcoin Bubble Loses Air, Frauds and Flaws Rise to Surface
Your appeal to celebrity icons does nothing to address the inherent problems with the lightening networks design.

Maybe you can explain the solution to the problems highlighted?

0wing··on As Bitcoin Bubble Loses Air, Frauds and Flaws Rise to Surface
And keys in memory, which increases the attack surface - especially noteworthy with the intel bugs.
0wing··on As Bitcoin Bubble Loses Air, Frauds and Flaws Rise to Surface
https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-...

http://www.coppolacomment.com/2018/01/probability-for-geeks....

http://www.coppolacomment.com/2018/01/lightning-and-fat-cont...

0wing··on Forget $9,000… Bitcoin falls below $7,000
Proof of Work algorithms are not hard to calculate, it's simply designed to increase capital costs to access writing to the database (adding the next 'block' set of transactions to the blockchain).

The actual math amounts to a best effort guess in a lottery for write access to a database.

The network would function just as fast with 3-10 computers as it does with 3 billion times the amount of "computing" power.

In summary, Proof of Work is designed to waste as much energy and capital input as possible.

0wing··on Forget $9,000… Bitcoin falls below $7,000
Even if OP is a Registered Investment Adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, it sounds like Kasian Franks could be in violation of The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 through 15 U.S.C. § 80b-21.
0wing··on CFTC and SEC Testimony on Cryptocurrencies [pdf]
Kasian Franks, are you a Registered Investment Adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission?

Even if you are it sounds like you're in violation of The Investment Advisers Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 through 15 U.S.C. § 80b-21.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/feeonlyplanner/2011/05/19/are-y...

Seems like a conflict of interest which I'd imagine your lawyer should have been aware of if you're part these two ICO fintech startups - starmine.ai and vectorspace.ai

https://vectorspace.ai/

http://starmine.ai/

interesting story from an investor who got burned from the starmine ICO due to inability for starmine to be listed on exchanges:

https://www.reddit.com/r/icocrypto/comments/73xbo2/starmine/

0wing··on First ever film donation blockchain, help create motion pictures
Donation?

Will the funds be in blockchain escrow to assure Anthony Daniel who is the CEO of Dream Comet Studios will not misuse the funds, or pull an exit scam?

Someone already tried this, and they predictably setup LLC shell companies with empty office spaces.

https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2018/01/26/children-of-...

0wing··on Predicting Random Numbers in Ethereum Smart Contracts
You misunderstand.

If a smart contract relies on an external data source from a normal server (oracle), then why even take the risk of deploying the smart contract?

If you're using an oracle for a data source you might as well do everything on a normal database.

0wing··on Predicting Random Numbers in Ethereum Smart Contracts
What's the point of using the network then?

Why not do everything more efficiently via the "oracle" server?

0wing··on Bitcoin Whipsaws Investors as Bubble Shows Signs of Bursting
CAPEX and OPEX production cost have nothing to do with the market spot price, especially because most of the coins in circulation have been produced or acquired for far far far less than the rate it costs today.
0wing··on Bitcoin Whipsaws Investors as Bubble Shows Signs of Bursting
No one cares what it costs you to produce the product.

Most of the coins in circulation already exist, and sellers can easily sell for less than it cost to produce today because most of the coins were produced for far far less than today's cost.

0wing··on Bitcoin Whipsaws Investors as Bubble Shows Signs of Bursting
All of the endpoints and traders and users can be targeted.

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/feds-raid-home-of-arizon...

0wing··on Bitcoin Whipsaws Investors as Bubble Shows Signs of Bursting
Anytime you buy a crypto-asset, it's someone else cashing out.

Consider where and how these assets are created, as it's more than likely a system designed to extract wealth from greater fools.

If the system does not let you produce the asset for the same amount of work that someone else put in (cryptocoins generate the bulk of the supply very early, and then cut off produciton to new users forcing low liquidity markets to exploit new users), why would you want to contribute to that cryptosystem?

0wing··on Bitcoin Whipsaws Investors as Bubble Shows Signs of Bursting
Lightening team is dubious and the design will likely evolve into a payment processor routing though a crypto-banking system.

https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/mathematical-proof-that-...

http://www.coppolacomment.com/2018/01/probability-for-geeks....

0wing··on Bitcoin drops below $9000 on Coinbase
While the cryptography might be resilient [1], in the real world people have been getting their bitcoins hacked and stolen very very commonly.

The ecosystem has some serious issues to solve for it to be ready for an everyday user.

[1] https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/about

0wing··on Bitcoin drops below $9000 on Coinbase
Well, mining Bitcoins is a net negative of wasted energy.

Every bit of computer power beyond the minimum threshold of efficiency needed to operate the transactions and database is a net loss.

Peak efficiency of the Bitcoin mining network would be about 3-10 basic desktop computers. Instead Satoshi Nakomoto's Proof of Work will waste more and more energy with nothing to show as time goes on.

0wing··on Bitcoin drops below $9000 on Coinbase
So you're saying Bitcoin is only good for early adopters and it's dangerous for new users to use Bitcoin because they could lose all their stored value when early adopters cash out?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........

0wing··on Bitcoin drops below $9000 on Coinbase
Raiblocks aka Nano is a scam.

"Distribution is complete" - how was the supply created and distributed?

https://raiblocks.net/page/frontiers.php?limit=100

Basically someone created Raiblocks by forking another DAG 'blockchain' database, and allocated themselves millions of coins spread across many addresses. A few thousand coins were given to the public if they clicked captchas.

These people who generated raiblocks / nano are now essentially multi-level marketeers trying to convince you to buy their beanie babies.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=raiblock+captch...

Remember, anytime you buy a cryptocurrency means someone else is trying to cash out.

0wing··on HyperNormalisation by Adam Curtis (2016) [video]
High resolution here:

http://thoughtmaybe.com/hypernormalisation/

More of Adam Curtis's filmography:

http://thoughtmaybe.com/by/adam-curtis/

0wing··on Cancer ‘vaccine’ eliminates tumors in mice
Yes but can it be done with minimal side effect?

Curing cancer with a bullet works too but the host suffers some adverse side effects.

0wing··on U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether
some contractor sold some an artificial intelligence predictive crime product to catch baddies somewhere in that pipeline
0wing··on Why I find IOTA alarming
RAIblocks isn't a protocol, it's someone running a centeralized database that publishes the results to everyone else. Dubious.
0wing··on U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether
Tether is looking a lot like Liberty Reserve, and that ended in seizure of assets.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Reserve#2013_seizure

0wing··on U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether
If Tether is a "scam" backed by nothing, why would other Cryptocurrencies be more valid?

It's just software.

0wing··on U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether
The SEC has a dedicated "Cyber" unit which targets Cryptocurrencies

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-176

0wing··on U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether
You're assuming the severity of this news would not cause Tether to devalue while BTC holders exit into real USD or fiat instead of Tether.
0wing··on U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether
Also consider nearly all of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are "premined" in the sense that only a few early adopters control more then half the supply due to how the work readjustment algorithms are skewed to generate all the coins very easy for a few users but later new users don't have equal access to produce coins as easily or cheaply as those other users.
0wing··on U.S. Regulators to Subpoena Crypto Exchange Bitfinex, Tether
Which account holders?

No one has provided proof of withdraw from Bitfinex USD or Tether since they've gotten kicked out of their banks.

Recent wires from Bitfinex have been associated with a rural bank in Poland which is normally only used only by farmers.

https://www.trustnodes.com/2017/11/22/bitfinex-reveals-new-p...

0wing··on Why I find IOTA alarming
Proof of Stake algorithms so far amount to various rationalizations on giving the wealthiest users more wealth.

To explain further, PoS blockrewards are settled as lotteries to stakeholders with each staked coin being granted a lottery ticket. Due to the all or nothing nature of newly printed coins from blockrewards, the wealthiest users will not just accumulate more newly printed coins on average but the statistical odds of them accumulating more of the future supply increases with time whereas poor users are entirely disqualified from thresholds required for "staking" and earning newly minted coins.

Page 1 of 3Next →