188 karma · joined October 18, 2022
The common argument is that people use bad furnaces or burn bad fuel or trash out of poverty, but far too often the actual cause is mentality and not financial issues.
Smog kills around 40,000 Polish people each year. [1] It was reported in 2025 to be 20 times more than in car accidents. [2]
On the bright side, industrial and post-apo art fans can wear breathing masks in Poland without even pretending.
[1] https://pulsmedycyny.pl/medycyna/choroby-ukladu-oddechowego/...
[2] https://www.infor.pl/prawo/nowosci-prawne/6826105,umiera-od-...
Also permission model on Sailfish was much worse than on Android. I didn't use Android apps on Sailfish, though.
I really liked Silica UI, but available apps had much less functionality than their counterparts on Android and iOS. I think that open sourcing Sailfish and Silica would end up better for them.
Nevertheless, I kinda liked the phone, but ultimately went back to Android.
[1] Polski Standard Płatności S.A. - Polish banks' joint venture, which created and operates BLIK.
BLIK has one ugly caveat, though: it has no chargeback procedure.
[1] Year 2024.
[2] https://www.blik.com/en/about-us#id-15ce9a61-2597-11f0-8657-...
This is not a quote of me. Nor is it an honest summary of what I wrote. It also completely ignores the context: the "educated people" were supposed to "see through" - the same people who predominantly prefer the same style. I have also never claimed the style is not used by other people. Quite the opposite. Not to mention, that education until 18 years of age is mandatory in Poland anyway.
> how is that not pretentious?
The straw man you made up definitely is.
> You started by saying complex sentences should always be preferred
I wrote that we were always taught to prefer one over another (there were multiple teachers along the way), not that we were taught to always prefer one over another.
> but now you ended by saying "only where applicable"
There is no "but now".
> and the sentence under discussion was "too long".
I believe it is indeed.
There's also the tendency in English to make new words out of existing ones to create new meanings, while in Polish we often use multiple separate existing words to create new meanings.
All in all, I believe English has more base forms than Polish.
Also, we were taught to prefer compound and complex sentences over simple ones where applicable, not at all costs. For instance, the quoted sentence from NTSB report is a bit too long in my opinion.
[1] https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0388.html
[2] https://crates.io/crates/derive_more
Nevertheless, it would be cool to be able to add #[noderive(Trait)] or something to a field not to be included in automatic trait implementation. Especially that sometimes foreign types do not implement some traits and one has to implement lots of boilerplate just to ignore fields of those types.
I know of Derivative crate [1], but it's yet another dependency in an increasingly NPM-like dependency tree of a modern Rust project.
All in all, I resort to manual trait implementations when needed, just as GP.
A quick web search revealed at least 4 other agent orchestration frameworks written in Rust [1][2][3][4]. Just being curious: did you decide against contributing to existing ones for some reason?
[1] https://github.com/kevin-rs/autogpt
[2] https://github.com/The-Swarm-Corporation/swarms-rs
[3] https://github.com/M4n5ter/rigs
[4] https://crates.io/crates/kowalski (for some reason GitHub link gives 404 and seems to be Ollama-only anyways)
Well, this is what the article proposes to architects indeed.