0123456789ABCDE

if one were to remove the expressions of excitement from the previous messages would it the model continue to demonstrate that same excitement scaling?

it is the latency that makes it significant

the example uses an external api, and i don't think they return probabilities from those anyway.

here's 7 lines

  import os
  import dspy

  lm = dspy.LM("openrouter/z-ai/glm-5.3-flash", api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"])
  jev = dspy.Predict('email:str -> choice:Literal["Legitimate", "Spam", "Phishing"]')
  email = "Payroll asks for your password on a non-company sign-in page."
  pred = jev(email=email, lm=lm)
  print(pred.choice)

what is it then?

specifically: what is the medium in which IRC exists, or operates in? are the people using IRC networking with each other, perhaps socializing?

aesthetics is an umbrella term for the "[…] norms and rules of participation, […] forms of sociality, and […] artistic outputs." — think: sociology, culture, customs, and less visuals. reading chapter five (aesthetics), perhaps unsurprisingly the chapter where the author dives deeper into the topic, is certainly advised.

                                   .sS$ tHE $$Ss.
                                   $$$$ $Ss,`$$$$
                                   $$$$ $$$$ $$$$
                                  ,$$$$ $$$$ $$$$.
     .sS$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$: $$$$.""""²$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Ss.
     $$$$' `²$²'.,sSSSSS$s`$',ss#SSS#ss.`$$$""""' $²"",ss#SSSSs`$$$²"S$$$$
     $$$$ $s._ `$$$$ |$$$$$ $$$$$  |$$$$ $$$ $  _.s$ $$$$  $$$$$|'.s$`$$$$
     $$$',$$$$',$$$| :$$$$ $#$szsmzs$$$$ $$$ $ `$$$$ $$$$  |$$$$ $$$$.`$$$
     $$',$$$$' $$$$:  $$$$ $$$$$    $$$$ $$$ $Ss`$$$$.`$$  :$$$$ `$$$$.`$$
     $$ $$$$;  `╙S$$S²'$$$ |$$$$   :$$$$ $$$ $$$ l$$$$ $`²S$$²'   :$$$$ $$
     $$.`$$$$         |S$$ $$$$$   |$$$$ $$$ `²' $$$$',$          $$$S',$$
     $$$s.²╙S$S#$s$#S$S╜²' S$$$$#s#S$S²',$$$S#$S$S╜²'`²╙S$S#$s#S$S╜²'.s$$$
     $$$$$                                                           $$$$$
     $$$$$                     P R E M i E R E                       $$$$$
     $$$$$                 A T O M i C X   U S H Q                   $$$$$
     $$$$$           P A R A D i G M   R E L E A S E   H Q           $$$$$
     $$$$$                                                           $$$$$
     `²S$$$SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS$$$S²'
        `$'
         |   SiteOps: X, Dee, Hazzy, Phiber
         :   Staff: Dream, BasecW, Sting, Tinywulf, Gal
        ,$s  Special Thanks: ADDiCTiON
        `²'

see: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661938

if i have it right, only commits can be manipulated, other contributions should be safe — i don't know what is possible for orgs moving old discussion archives into github, see python's issues for reference

see: https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo

unsafe code is likely being used as in unsafe rust, which is different from exploit code

certainly the wording seems to leave the door open for potentially compromised code as in supply-chain attack credential stealer or prompt injection data exfiltration, but sprites are not marketed as sandboxes for malware detonation

neither of the observations gp made is dependent upon the definition of machine, nor is it dependent on the inclusion of the examples you brought up in that definition.

the "largest real-world demonstration of Claude's capabilities" is sitting in local repos, built with the daily quota leftovers from corpo accounts

unfortunately i did not add a note at the time

for supporting evidence, see first chart here: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5