14,226 karma · joined August 20, 2012
Another definition of a basic salt would be a salt that contains amounts of both hydroxide and other anions. White lead is an example. It is basic lead carbonate, or lead carbonate hydroxide. These salts are insoluble and are obtained through precipitation reactions.
So good luck with that exercise.
Take a look here:
http://www.miseagrant.umich.edu/lessons/lessons/by-broad-con...
Maybe the sixteen co-authors could have...oh, wait what?
The original uses shorthand "~=" for coarse equality, in lieu of {option+x}.
This is silly. NY Times is "the paper of record." The blackline of this article shows the entire piece was re-written. They did this as part of an experiment in "propogating" viral content. But "propogating propoganda"like this expressly at odds with being the "paper of record".
Lastly, if you look up (and read) the footnotes in my earlier not, you'll se that there is a clear link between the academic critique of 'journalistic integrity' and the anti-vaccination example, insofar as 'false balance' is a well defined sub-topic of that debate. Under the Wikipedia article for that...you notice (rightly or wrongly) that of the examples given, the anti-vaccination quakery (eg, kennedy in rollin stone etc) is a "well worn" example.
In other words, a commenter making reference to this is not making any novel or original argument that needs "footnotes". Footnotes are useful when there is a more subtle point, a nuance or something that is not obvious. Footnotes are less called for here, as a simple google search will attest.
"He had written a much-discussed and much-challenged story for Rolling Stone last year linking childhood vaccines and a rise in autism."
"Nonetheless, perhaps more than any other Kennedy of his generation, he is looked upon as the next potential vessel for Something Bigger. In words, temperament and actions, he conveys a frenetic vibe of restlessness that invites the questions "What else?" "What next?" "What more?""
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/fashion/25bobby.html?pagew...
Its this kind of stuff that is ultimately problematic. Note that this is in the 'fashion' section of the NYT.
You could say that 'Salon' is outide your definition of mainstream media, but the issue is that the sites you mentioned still cover the stories, even if nothing more than as references in pursuit of 'journalistic integrity'.
Obviously google will turn up lots of materiel on this if you want it.
(Note that the current treatment of these topics is far more skeptical. The LA times in 2015 is not going to treat these topics the same as the NY times in 2006.)
HN asks him for citations.
Srsly?
________
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalistic_objectivity
[3] with ref (1) to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal_controversy
[4] http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/dangerous_immunity/
[5] http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/13/science/la-sci-autis...
-- Top Comment on that thread
This is a wholy different issue that the dust up a month ago. Thats why a petition for the CEO's resignation has 200,000 signatures. The incident 1 month ago promted onlt 10K or so, so this latest issue is a 20x increase in pissed off people.
This reeks of lack of imagination.
Eliminate NYC from new york state and what happens? Same Chicago and LA in their respective states. Likewise, many western states have huge flows of government spending for reasons that don't make sense on the surface. Those states, tend to have military installations, and huge allocations of national parks and national forest land.
In other words, that type of government spending is not social policy handouts. But rather is the US paying to keep up assets that it owns already (basically security and maintenance).
Rural appalachia is an exception (eg, west va = highly democratic; TN home of senator gore, etc) as these states were the target of many early government projects (like TVA and Food Stamps).
Lastly, huge amounts of governmnet spending are on healthcare
(& social security, which again have nothing to do with modern red state/blue state issues).
I think for that there should be some mechanism to let the investors take the hit. The issue is whether or not the cost to bail out greece would be cheaper than to deal with the incremental risk premium on the rest of the eu debts. At some stage the tradeoff between economic logic and incentives (moral hazard) needs to be dealt with more transparently.
suprisingly, its not as terrible for the environment as it looks. but its not pleasant to see or be around regardless.
obviously, don't do this in CA b/c wildfires...etc.
2 wheel transit requires actual expertise unless limited to mediterranean climates. you also have no way to deal with practical concerns like injuries, spare tires, designated drivers, and transit of things like gear for sports. that is all stuff that is the bread and butter of yound people needing cars/transit and why the parents delegate it out.
on the flipside, smaller cars & motorsycles are more dangerous. EG, when hit by all the massive SUVs and crazy f150 class vehicles favored by commercial drivers.
their is a logic to why americans drive the cars they do. in part that's why the story is more akin to a tradgedy than a farce. the issues don't solve themselves with trivial remedies.
Untill their is public transit that is safe, all-weather, and comprehensive, the public will need de-centralized and private transit solutions.
unfortunately, the geographic and population topography of the country does not suit the european model of public transporation. there are also many issues now that it is "too late" to save places like california, who now have such massice entrnched residential real estate that new transit corridors cannot be built by the state without paying in essence ransom to current deed holders.
...etc.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/11707591/Why-me...