So it's not sexist if men and women are different, as long as it's "immune system functions" and not "statistical behaviors at work"?
How did you arrive at the distinction?
How did you arrive at the distinction?
Just joking of course. Women having different immune system functions means more funding for women specific medicine - hence it is good. Study of behavior at workplace based on gender doesn't generate funding because there aren't many women doing startups anyway.
You keep watching, in a decade or two when there will be enough women in startups that they will actually have any economical significance there WILL be studies conducted. And depending on how that turns out - if 'women better than men', it will be an 'evil corrected' story, and if 'women worse than men', state will intervene via laws to protect women's rights. It has already started actually.
This is why I took the risk of losing mod points and posted 'another decade' comment above.