This seems like a long time, is it normal?
This seems like a long time, is it normal?
1) Negative Screening (6hrs) - Figuring out what compounds show up initially. Special dyes were use to identify potential compounds. Not conclusive but narrows down the next steps
2) Extraction (10 - 18 hrs) - Separate the target compounds from the rest of compounds/proteins in the sample fluid.
3) Postive Certification via GCMS (2hrs - 16hrs) - The extracted compounds were ionized (broken into predictable pieces) then sent through the GCMS to where a signal signature determined.
Each step included equipment expensive materials and equipment. The last step is was the most expensive and error prone. The GCMS machines need maintenance and calibration. They cost anywhere from $30,000 to $70,000.
Sometimes we lost samples because the machine would lose it's calibration and wouldn't be enough to start another set. We took in samples on a national scale, but I can see how a smaller non-commercial lab accumulate a large backlog.
This was like 10 years ago but I don't see the technology changing that much.
But maybe tests are done in stages? Like, if nothing obvious shows up on first tests then some other ones are done?
It'd be interesting to see what the bottlenecks are and how to improve them.
http://www.texastribune.org/2013/04/05/commission-looks-misc...
Harris county, Texas just recently got a new one because of similarly disturbing corruption and incompetence.
in the case where, say, a serial rapist/killer hasn't been caught, there can be a backlog of untested DNA from other crime scenes that may identify the suspect, but haven't been tested because of the backlog.