Hacker News Reader

Comment by gorgak | Hacker News Reader

you dont understand because you work in their PR dept. i wont go into the evidence of intelligence agencies involvement in false flag terrorist incidents. you can look it up for yourself. try 'gladio'

View on HN

> you work in their PR dept

Do you make this assumption about everyone who disagrees with you?

its hardly an assumption, the thing was an advert mate.

> you dont understand because you work in their PR dept.

Personal attacks are not allowed on Hacker News. We ban accounts that do this repeatedly.

So you respond to a personal attack with a personal attack? Or am I missing something.

EDIT

Good you're reading this. Shilling is increasing on HN. Is there a plan in place to deal with it?

I know what Gladio was, the NATO stay-behind operation in Italy. However the argument that something happened once therefore it is happening all the time is pretty flawed. Nobody would ever suggest that the existence of Gladio means that flase-flag operations are standard practice or the default mdoe of operation for the IC.

But without any sort of oversight, accountability, or really any of the sort of mechanisms that should be in place for this to be considered an agency of a functional democracy, we have to assume that if they have the ability to do it with a very low chance of getting caught, and they've already done it in the past, there's a fairly good chance they're doing it again.

We won't assume they are 100% still doing it, but there is a significant non-trivial probability that they are, and in what we like to call a democracy, this is very very wrong.

you dont know what gladio was. it wasnt confined to italy. and. isnt.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com