> of course it was done for money, I don't think there's any doubt about that. The question is: Is that bad?
Yes it is. They have started to sell users just like everyone else.
Yes it is. They have started to sell users just like everyone else.
> (4) Individuals’ security and privacy on the Internet are fundamental and must not be treated as optional.
Google, Pocket, etc. are arguably not compatible with this manifesto, because their business model is precisely to sell user data.
So Mozilla says it respects and defend your privacy but makes deals with companies that won't. I'll let you pick a name for that kind of behaviour.
The issue here is about the reason why it was included _as a default_ in the first place.